Now it's Musk who's triumphed!

[carmanmemoranda]

The article doesn't provide any evidence to say this isn't true.
They make things up in an attempt to prove it is false. Why do that?

Rated high for factual reporting.

Mild bias, mostly central.

Likely to be way way more accurate than Trump's ramblings. $50 million for condoms? But you don't question that?

 

[Lirefighter]

Show me the evidence it’s lies.


Here’s the tweet ya muppet

This is a perfect example of how MAGAs like you have a complete inability to,cross check anything because you are brainwashed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1887265464310480912

They both retweeted that claim, which is endorsement

Musk amplifies fake report claiming USAID paid celebrities to support Zelensky​

“Elon Musk, Donald Trump Jr and other prominent conservatives are sharing a video that claims to show E! News reporting that the US's humanitarian agency paid millions of dollars to celebrities including Angelina Jolie and Ben Stiller to visit Ukraine and help boost President Volodymyr Zelensky's popularity amid the country's war with Russia. But the clip is not an authentic report, a spokesperson for the entertainment news channel told AFP, and Stiller has publicly rejected the allegations as false”

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36XA8LR

No, Chelsea Clinton, Ben Stiller And Politico Didn’t Get Millions From USAID: The Biggest DOGE Hoaxes Spread On X​

The Biggest Hoaxes Spread By Elon Musk And DOGE, Debunked

False claims about government spending have gone viral on social media, frequently boosted by DOGE leader Elon Musk.

www.forbes.com

He reposted something that didn't mention Ben Stiller. It said celebrities.
They made that bit up, ie a lie.

Show me the evidence it’s lies.


Here’s the tweet ya muppet

This is a perfect example of how MAGAs like you have a complete inability to,cross check anything because you are brainwashed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1887265464310480912

They both retweeted that claim, which is endorsement

Musk amplifies fake report claiming USAID paid celebrities to support Zelensky​

“Elon Musk, Donald Trump Jr and other prominent conservatives are sharing a video that claims to show E! News reporting that the US's humanitarian agency paid millions of dollars to celebrities including Angelina Jolie and Ben Stiller to visit Ukraine and help boost President Volodymyr Zelensky's popularity amid the country's war with Russia. But the clip is not an authentic report, a spokesperson for the entertainment news channel told AFP, and Stiller has publicly rejected the allegations as false”

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36XA8LR

No, Chelsea Clinton, Ben Stiller And Politico Didn’t Get Millions From USAID: The Biggest DOGE Hoaxes Spread On X​

The Biggest Hoaxes Spread By Elon Musk And DOGE, Debunked

False claims about government spending have gone viral on social media, frequently boosted by DOGE leader Elon Musk.

www.forbes.com

And now they're trying to block the doge agency from accessing the treasury accounts.
Hmmm?
Still. Non of the people you claim said this was true, have done so.

 

[MNW67]

And now they're trying to block the doge agency from accessing the treasury accounts.
Hmmm?

I think it is about people without vetting or security clearance being given access to the personal sensitive data of tens of millions of private citizens.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Great Britain is a description of the countries and islands, not of any perceived greatness or not

For goodness sake, did you see me use a capital G? I'm not using the word great in that context, I'm simply saying do we remember when Britain used to be great (as in brilliant) we led the world.

Now look at us.

 

[MNW67]

For goodness sake, did you see me use a capital G? I'm not using the word great in that context, I'm simply saying do we remember when Britain used to be great (as in brilliant) we led the world.

Now look at us.

How far back are you thinking e.g. pre WWI?

 

[Lirefighter]

I think it is about people without vetting or security clearance being given access to the personal sensitive data of tens of millions of private citizens.

That's a good excuse that will buy them time to fire up the shredder's.
If Elon doesn't have the required clearance to look into this then, Trump really should task someone who does, asap.

 

[MNW67]

That's a good excuse that will buy them time to fire up the shredder's.
If Elon doesn't have the required clearance to look into this then, Trump really should task someone who does, asap.

It's not just Musk, he's brought along a team of people in their early 20s from his companies.

This data is digital and they've already had a week to take whatever they want.

 

[Lirefighter]

How far back are you thinking e.g. pre WWI?

 

[MNW67]

I think it is about people without vetting or security clearance being given access to the personal sensitive data of tens of millions of private citizens.

I find it most amusing that on one thread we have right wingers saying it is a travesty that our security services might be allowed access to a few people's private data to stop terrorism and child abuse. But they are all in favour of this unvetted and unsupervised bunch having access to the private sensitive data of tens of millions of people.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

How far back are you thinking e.g. pre WWI?

And trumpian tactics ?

Dream on

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I find it most amusing that on one thread we have right wingers saying it is a travesty that our security services might be allowed access to a few people's private data to stop terrorism and child abuse. But they are all in favour of this unvetted and unsupervised bunch having access to the private sensitive data of tens of millions of people.

Spot on

 

[Lirefighter]

It's not just Musk, he's brought along a team of people in their early 20s from his companies.

This data is digital and they've already had a week to take whatever they want.

Not sure what the age of the employees has to do with it, but the shredder remark was just a metaphor. I know these things are digital, and digital things can be deleted.

 

[Lirefighter]

I find it most amusing that on one thread we have right wingers saying it is a travesty that our security services might be allowed access to a few people's private data to stop terrorism and child abuse. But they are all in favour of this unvetted and unsupervised bunch having access to the private sensitive data of tens of millions of people.

So who does have access to this data?
Someone must.
Who's guarding the guards?

 

[MNW67]

So who does have access to this data?
Someone must.
Who's guarding the guards?

Usually, a small number of senior civil servants with high security clearance.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

So who does have access to this data?
Someone must.
Who's guarding the guards?

It should be about who has access and why.

Not what the data is.