Now it's Musk who's triumphed!

carmanmemoranda said:
Take it in context and it explains itself

You are just spouting stuff that isn't verifiable and expect it to go un challenged.

Keep doing it and people will chase (hound) you until you can explain how you have fact checked it.

Keep doing the same thing, you have to keep expecting the same thing.

Proving your fact checking system would throw the pack onto a different scent. People can't argue if the facts are proven.
Click to expand...
If this is the justification for your bile. Save it. You are going back on blanket ignore.
 
. said:
If this is the justification for your bile. Save it. You are going back on blanket ignore.
Click to expand...
Don't talk about bile.

It goes 2 ways.

Why is it always those that want free speech that can't take it ? You don't want free speech you want free lies.
 
. said:
$25,000 for a DEI opera in Columbia to increase transgender representation ($22,020 was non-federal state funding)

USAspending.gov

www.usaspending.gov www.usaspending.gov
Click to expand...
It's so sad to see tax dollars being wasted on this sort of rubbish, pushing the trans narrative as much as they can, trying to normalise trans and make good old male/female seem like the odd ones out.
 
diy_fun_uk said:
Hey, it works for the high majority of politicians out there, especially those at the top tier. All parties, all persuasions.

What's good for the goose ...
Click to expand...
Not true.

Easy to be fact checked. You will find they are vague, not spreading lies.
 
diy_fun_uk said:
It's so sad to see tax dollars being wasted on this sort of rubbish, pushing the trans narrative as much as they can, trying to normalise trans and make good old male/female seem like the odd ones out.
Click to expand...
Agreed, one American could have used that as a helping hand to pay to go through college. Just utter unwarranted waste.
 
. said:
OK, so USAID did fund:

• $1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia’s workplaces
Click to expand...

This is the one that interests me. The latest US state department report shows that there are very serious levels of discrimination against women in the workplace in Serbia. I do not see, as part of its wider mission, that USAid giving a modest amount of money to try to rectify that is a huge problem. Just as I would not see money to promote the education of girls in Pakistan as an evil endeavour.

Also, I have to say that I am surprised that these four examples are the worst they can come up with!
 
MNW67 said:
This is the one that interests me. The US state department report shows that there are very serious levels of discrimination against women in the workplace in Serbia. I do not see, as part of its wider mission. that USAid giving a modest amount of money to try to rectify that is a huge problem. Just as I would not see money to promote the education of girls in Pakistan as an evil endeavour.

Also, I have to say that I am surprised that these four examples are the worst they can come up with!
Click to expand...
There are serious levels of discrimination against women all over the world. Does the US taxpayer want to pay money to Serbia to do something in workplaces though?
 
. said:
There are serious levels of discrimination against women all over the world. Does the US taxpayer want to pay money to Serbia to do something in workplaces though?
Click to expand...

I actually think they would be fine with it. There's nothing wrong with doing good things all round the world whilst winning hearts and minds.
 
MNW67 said:
I actually think they would be fine with it. There's nothing wrong with doing good things all round the world whilst winning hearts and minds.
Click to expand...
Sounds like what people say when they are spending other people's money.
 
. said:
There are serious levels of discrimination against women all over the world. Does the US taxpayer want to pay money to Serbia to do something in workplaces though?
Click to expand...
If it results in trade for USA, then yes, they might.

Without the bigger picture it's just grabbing headlines and making it suit the answer.

Soft power cam be much more influential than it's given credit for
 
carmanmemoranda said:
Not true.

Easy to be fact checked. You will find they are vague, not spreading lies.
Click to expand...
Are you deluded?

Year in year out we get this ...

We're going to sort the NHS
We're going to build enough houses
We're going to lower crime
We're going to lower unemployment
We're going to sort the immigration crisis
We're going to sort education

... etc. How many of them are ever resolved? That's not being vague with the electorate, that's lying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top