• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Petrolheads

johnny2007 said:
Sorry, I forgot about the retardds here who want proof of everything.
Click to expand...

I'm trying to imagine what kind of twisted, dysfunctional, anti-world someone would live in wherein people who value proof are the retarrds.

But my imagination can't conjure up anything that defective.
 
Avocet said:
Yes, ash frame - and my mate's was rotten! They go round the back window, typically, and a bugger to sort properly.

I was at a meeting at the British Motor Museum the other week, and I absolutely love this MG SA:

View attachment 371459

View attachment 371461
Click to expand...
A great looking car, but the sort of motor you have to wear a fedora, chew a cigar and end every other sentence with "...see."
Tommy gun optional.:cool:
 
morqthana said:
In 2023 the 2nd bit of thinking was correct, and the 1st wasn't.
Click to expand...
Do you have figures ? Im guessing it must be close.
Edited.

The figures I've seen show it was close in 2023 and changing every quarter by around 1 to 2 %
morqthana said:
Haven't readily found 2024 data.
Click to expand...
Too soon I think. But 3 cylinder engine sales are increasing rapidly over there
 
Last edited:
morqthana said:
I'm trying to imagine what kind of twisted, dysfunctional, anti-world someone would live in wherein people who value proof are the retarrds.

But my imagination can't conjure up anything that defective.
Click to expand...
You want proof of opinions.
That's the problem.
Only retarrds can't understand this.
 
Odds said:
A great looking car, but the sort of motor you have to wear a fedora, chew a cigar and end every other sentence with "...see."
Tommy gun optional.:cool:
Click to expand...


Yeah... well... to drive an MGA you'd have to be a beardy weirdy who likes warm beer and Morris dancing!:p
 
johnny2007 said:
You want proof of opinions.
That's the problem.
Click to expand...

I want proof that opinions are based on things which are actual, factual, verifiable realities, and are not just 100% inventions based on absolutely nothing other than whatever complete fictions the opinion holder has made up.

And wanting that should not be a problem to any opinion holders who are not total retarrds.
 
morqthana said:
I want proof that opinions are based on things which are actual, factual, verifiable realities, and are not just 100% inventions based on absolutely nothing other than whatever complete fictions the opinion holder has made up.

And wanting that should not be a problem to any opinion holders who are not total retarrds.
Click to expand...
There you go!
 
Stivino said:
Those things actually are facts, not opinions.
Click to expand...
Consider this as an example.

Let's say that the incidence of benefit fraud is x%.

An opinion that "benefit fraud is too high" is valid.

If someone erroneously believes that the incidence is 10x% an opinion that "benefit fraud is too high" is not valid.

Stivino said:
I would at least expect a total ****** to be able to spell it.
Don't get angry with me, I'm just pointing out the irony.
:)
Click to expand...

And how should we classify those who have failed to spot that it they don't write it as "retarrd" the forum automatically removes it?

ScreenHunter 2166.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Odds
The End is Nigh
Replies
12
Views
427
Odds
Odds
Back
Top