Piddington.

[Koolpc]

H-man is using the F.boy bumper book of bullshine and bowlocks for his info these days.

Around 522 people were receiving Home Office asylum support in Hull as of mid-2026 and The Royal Hotel on Ferensway—which had been used for over six years to house asylum seekers and was targeted during the August 2024 riots—has officially stopped housing asylum seekers as the Home Office and Hull City Council relocated remaining occupants.

The issue is the unofficial illegal immigrants too......how many are swarming into our country unnoticed?

 

[Boney Em]

The issue is the unofficial illegal immigrants too......how many are swarming into our country unnoticed?

If you do not know how many, how do you if there is any?

 

[Koolpc]

If you do not know how many, how do you if there is any?

Wake up for goodness sake himmy!

Where I used to live there were loads. I know because of the people I knew who employed them...they are everywhere.

 

[Boney Em]

Wake up for goodness sake himmy!

Where I used to live there were loads. I know because of the people I knew who employed them...they are everywhere.

How did you know they were illegal immigrants? Or were they just foreign lookng?

 

[Highway Man]

H-man is using the F.boy bumper book of bullshine and bowlocks for his info these days.

Around 522 people were receiving Home Office asylum support in Hull as of mid-2026 and The Royal Hotel on Ferensway—which had been used for over six years to house asylum seekers and was targeted during the August 2024 riots—has officially stopped housing asylum seekers as the Home Office and Hull City Council relocated remaining occupants.

I live here, don't be fooled by the lies told in the papers.

 

[Highway Man]

About 17% of serving male soldiers have a criminal record.
As it has been claimed that the majority of asylum seekers are young males, we should see how many young serving soldiers have a criminal record: over 20% compared to the civilian population of just 7%.
Foreign National offenders (of all ages, and not just asylum seekers ) number about 12% with a criminal record.
Maybe the local population will be safer with asylum seekers being housed in ex-army barracks.

A bit more light shedded upon your biased view. Puts things into perspective and more understandable.
Non-Violent vs. Violent Offences: While overall lifetime offending is lower in the military than in the general public, certain studies noted that rates of specific violent offenses can be higher among younger male service members or combat veterans depending on deployment history and mental health factors like PTSD

 

[Boney Em]

A bit more light shedded upon your biased view. Puts things into perspective and more understandable.
Non-Violent vs. Violent Offences: While overall lifetime offending is lower in the military than in the general public, certain studies noted that rates of specific violent offenses can be higher among younger male service members or combat veterans depending on deployment history and mental health factors like PTSD

As I was comparing serving military service men (the previous occupants of the camp) with asylum seekers, my comparison is fair.
Where your comparison with th general population of UK is not because the general popualtion were never, nor were ever going to be housed in former military barracks.
And as the majority of asylum seekers are young men, it is only fair to compare the criminal records young soldiers to that of young asylum seekers.
Let me remind you: Serving Young soldier criminal rate, as a percentage of that population: over 20%.
Foreign Nationals, i.e. all foreign students, foreign workers, long-term settled foreigner, etc. (Not just Asylum seekers) 17%.
You have also pointed out that young serving soldiers are more likely to be involved in violent crimes.

Therefore my suggestion that the local inhabitants of Piddington will be safer housing asylum seekers, rather than military, is borne out by statistics.


Also your claim that military in general have a lower crime rate than the overall population is incorrect:
Military: 17%
General Population: 7%.

So the light is shone both on my factual view and your biased view.

 

[Highway Man]

As I was comparing serving military service men (the previous occupants of the camp) with asylum seekers, my comparison is fair.
Where your comparison with th general population of UK is not because the general popualtion were never, nor were ever going to be housed in former military barracks.
And as the majority of asylum seekers are young men, it is only fair to compare the criminal records young soldiers to that of young asylum seekers.
Let me remind you: Serving Young soldier criminal rate, as a percentage of that population: over 20%.
Foreign Nationals, i.e. all foreign students, foreign workers, long-term settled foreigner, etc. (Not just Asylum seekers) 17%.
You have also pointed out that young serving soldiers are more likely to be involved in violent crimes.

Therefore my suggestion that the local inhabitants of Piddington will be safer housing asylum seekers, rather than military, is borne out by statistics.


Also your claim that military in general have a lower crime rate than the overall population is incorrect:
Military: 17%
General Population: 7%.

So the light is shone on your biased view.

There are reasons why young serving military men may commit violent offences, they may have bnever commited an offence in their lives before serving. The army likes highly trained violent men. We do not want an army of soft leftys now do we.

 

[Boney Em]

There are reasons why young serving military men may commit violent offences, they may have bnever commited an offence in their lives before serving. The army likes highly trained violent men. We do not want an army of soft leftys now do we.

That corroborates my opinion that the local population of Piddington will be safer with the ex-army barracks housing asylum seekers instead of military.

 

[Highway Man]

That corroborates my opinion that the local population of Piddington will be safer with the ex-army barracks housing asylum seekers instead of military.

The military personel are more respectful towards normal folk and especially so towards the older generation. The only problem occurs with thugs and cocky young men and violence is usually kept within the confines of their own camps.

 

[Boney Em]

The military personel are more respectful towards normal folk and especially so towards the older generation. The only problem occurs with thugs and cocky young men and violence is usually kept within the confines of their own camps.

Can you provide any data to confirm that?
I am sorry, but your idea of reality will not suffice.

My argument is supported by factual data. And your perception of violent serving young soldiers confirms the accuracy of the data.They are conditioned to become violent young men. You now suggest that they are instilled with discipline along with violence. The recent investigations into potential war crimes committed by serving soldiers disproves that.
Reminds me of the typical response by the IDF when confronted with accusations of war crimes, "The IDF is the most moral army in the world".

There are reasons why young serving military men may commit violent offences, they may have bnever commited an offence in their lives before serving. The army likes highly trained violent men. We do not want an army of soft leftys now do we.

The local populace should be safer housing asylum seekers in the former military barracks.
They are far less likely to engage in bar room brawls.

 

[danfre]

So the local population will be safer having 1200 gimigrants in a small village as opposed to the military.
What a dreamer.

 

[Odds]

I live here, don't be fooled by the lies told in the papers.

You've counted them all?

 

[pete01]

No one wants them here really just not all will admit it.

 

[Highway Man]

You've counted them all?

Not counted the numbers but see them all of the time, unless I m seeing the same ones there are lots of them, more than there should be over here.