Piddington.

Statistically, YES, if the number of asylum seekers matched the number of military.
Considering the base previously housed over 2,500 military, absolutely, YES.
They would be safer by on two counts, statistically asylum seekers commit far fewer crimes, and there would be only half as many asylum seekers as there were military.
What a load of codsawallop. Any problems within the military is dealt with by the military and the consequences of being caught up in military disciplinary procedings is severe. The punishments outweigh the crimes 10 fold which in itself is prohibitive. I did 3 months in colchester which is a military prison and I can tell you now you would never see a re offender. Every soldier in the British army is drilled in discipline and respect for others. Comparing a set of savages from Afghanistan and the such with the British military is a silly argument and a non starter.. You might prefer to live amongst them rather than live amongst the soldiers that are in place to protect you, but that is why we are over run with illegal immigrants.
 
You all share the same anti-foreigner political ideology, so of course you are going to spread the anti-foreigner urban gossip.
Likewise you spread the good news of illegal immigration and of their enrichment and integration into our society.
 
What a load of codsawallop. Any problems within the military is dealt with by the military and the consequences of being caught up in military disciplinary procedings is severe. The punishments outweigh the crimes 10 fold which in itself is prohibitive. I did 3 months in colchester which is a military prison and I can tell you now you would never see a re offender. Every soldier in the British army is drilled in discipline and respect for others. Comparing a set of savages from Afghanistan and the such with the British military is a silly argument and a non starter.. You might prefer to live amongst them rather than live amongst the soldiers that are in place to protect you, but that is why we are over run with illegal immigrants.
You can have your rant, for which you offer no proof, but it does not change the statistics. It is just your opinion.
Statistically the local populace will be safer with asymlum seekers housd in the ex-military base than the former military occupiers.
And I have shown the proof with the statistics, the statistics available to public viewing. Of course other crimes, such as those committed on the base by the military do not appear in the public records.
So the public statistics might be an under-reporting.
 
Likewise you spread the good news of illegal immigration and of their enrichment and integration into our society.
Do I?
Is that a knowingly false accusation.
You could prove your accusation to be true by presenting the evidence to prove your accusation, but you do not do proof, jugding by your behaviour so far.
 
You can have your rant, for which you offer no proof, but it does not change the statistics. It is just your opinion.
Statistically the local populace will be safer with asymlum seekers housd in the ex-military base than the former military occupiers.
And I have shown the proof with the statistics, the statistics available to public viewing. Of course other crimes, such as those committed on the base by the military do not appear in the public records.
So the public statistics might be an under-reporting.
Any intervention by the police with military personel is reported back to the base where the consequences may only be a slap on the wrist by the police will most certainly be a severe punishment from the military. Your figures and stats are deeply flawed and if you applied common sense to your argument, you would realise it is as said, a load of codswallop with no substance.
 
Do I?
Is that a knowingly false accusation.
You could prove your accusation to be true by presenting the evidence to prove your accusation, but you do not do proof, jugding by your behaviour so far.
You appear to believe that it is safer to house a few thousand unvetted illegal immigrants into a military base than to house tthe military personnel. Are you refering to the french foreign legion? Even then your argument is laughable at best.
 
Any intervention by the police with military personel is reported back to the base where the consequences may only be a slap on the wrist by the police will most certainly be a severe punishment from the military. Your figures and stats are deeply flawed and if you applied common sense to your argument, you would realise it is as said, a load of codswallop with no substance.
Prove they are flawed by presenting evidence to the contrary. I am sorry but your opinion that the statistics are flawed will just not do.
But you do not do proof, as shown by your earlier comments.
 
You appear to believe that it is safer to house a few thousand unvetted illegal immigrants into a military base than to house tthe military personnel. Are you refering to the french foreign legion?
I have provided statistical proof that the local populace will be statistically safer with asylum seekers in the camp, than military service personnel.
Disprove the statistics, or find other evidence to prove your point, but just repeating your opinion is pointless.
 
I have provided statistical proof that the local populace will be statistically safer with asylum seekers in the camp, than military service personnel.
Disprove the statistics, or find other evidence to prove your point, but just repeating your opinion is pointless.
I have no need to provide evidence to such a ridiculous claim. Show evidence that an illegal immigrant is safer to live near than a serving disciplined soldier. Don't make me laugh.
 
I have no need to provide evidence to such a ridiculous claim. Show evidence that an illegal immigrant is safer to live near than a serving disciplined soldier. Don't make me laugh.
Don't feed the troll. It will seek out your soft spots and keep worming in, it has a serious narcissistic personality disorder and all its wants is to be validated by your responce.
It will follow you over numerous threads once it attaches to you.
Stop replying and watch the attempts to get a responce from you start to intensify - nut case n-otch was just the same.
 
Old Boney Em is slotting in quite well as a 'new' forum member, don't you think? Only been here 3 days, multiple non diy posts and I don’t think there’s anyone he’s not argued with. Now, who do we know that is like that? :unsure:
 
Back
Top