probably notShould we doing a trade deal with a country that actively supports pootins invasion and appears to supply mercenaries

probably notShould we doing a trade deal with a country that actively supports pootins invasion and appears to supply mercenaries
It seems pretty clear JD has endeavoured to keep within the 140 word per article) limit even if he’s a few characters over; to cut off a quote in mid sentence would just be daft. He cites the source. He’s not money from it, or denying their revenue stream. I doubt they are concerned.I think you need to read it again.

There is no 140 word per article allowance, in either the agreement or Law.It seems pretty clear JD has endeavoured to keep within the 140 word per article) limit even if he’s a few characters over;
This is not the issue, the issue is without a link to the source, they are denied all benefits.to cut off a quote in mid sentence would just be daft. He cites the source. He’s not money from it, or denying their revenue stream. I doubt they are concerned.


Are we any nearer this mythical cliff edge yet?

EDF in France is an alternative modelThere must be a middle ground between public ownership and private
Someone more intelligent than me probably knows

By this do you mean that you believe privatisation only has benefits in a competitive market?For me, if there is no ability for the consumer to benefit from competition in the market (e.g. gas and electric), there is no benefit of privatisation. The better model is outsourcing, to benefit from private expertise.
But again it makes limited sense in the water industry.

EDF in France is an alternative model
It’s a fully private company but the French govt own all the shares.
And effectively subsidise their own energy supplyAnd they own some of our electricity infrastructure too.
140 words with no spaces is the same as 140 words with characters.There is no 140 word per article allowance, in either the agreement or Law.
The source is acknowledgedThis is not the issue, the issue is without a link to the source, they are denied all benefits.

NoBy this do you mean that you believe privatisation only has benefits in a competitive market?
Thats on the group outsourcing to manage their IP.Because outsourcing often prevents competition since the 'expertise' has albeit disappeared from public bodies...
There are lots of skills that a well run public body has no use of on a day to day basis, but needs expertise in as and when. While its true that knowing the "business" is important, it can also be important to know others business more.Thus those public bodies find themselves with no choice to bring in the private sector and are advised by higher paid 'consultants' who now swallow up far more money than in-house experts used to cost.

the restriction is 30 words - the abstract140 words with no spaces is the same as 140 words with characters.
They are denied the benefits of the link, which is why they want it. There are over 200 violations on this forum, they'd want some money if they knew.The source is acknowledged