Er, I'm not fond of speculation, but I'll give it a whirl,Softus, turn it around, please!
I don't know what he should have written, because I don't know what he's trying to convey.If you think TT's advice is misleading or wrong, would you be so kind as to tell us all what he should have written or indeed define "low" and "high" for us?
I can't define "low" and "high", because I don't know on what grounds he was claiming the thing that he's claiming.
All I can do is suggest the following improvement to his sentence...
Since the voltage between N & E is likely to be low, it is unlikely that a dangerous current will flow through a human body.
...which would serve the goal of accuracy, but I don't know if that's what TicklyT meant.
It would be much simpler, and quicker, if TicklyT would simply give a quantitative example of a scenario with a low voltage and a high current.
Please explain which inadequacies you believe are relevant in this context.holmslaw said:You will notice he has'nt actually contributed to this discussion because that would expose his own inadequacies