S&P500 is plunging almost as fast as Trumps popularity.
S&P500 is plunging almost as fast as Trumps popularity.
now what was it you thought was the answer oh yeah this is what you putThank you for admitting you were wrong.
Poor gas112 has had to do some furious googling…only to find out he was WRONG
Poor gas112 always WRONG
what does that matter to you thought you didnt want the rich getting richer you should be happyS&P500 is plunging almost as fast as Trumps popularity.
despite wiping over $100bn off his stock, Musk is still the worlds richest man with over $300bn and Warren Buffet actually made money since Trump's tariff war kicked off.what does that matter to you thought you didnt want the rich getting richer you should be happy
I read that Warren Buffet has liquidated his assets for 350billion dollars, that would make him richer than Musk.despite wiping over $100bn off his stock, Musk is still the worlds richest man with over $300bn and Warren Buffet actually made money since Trump's tariff war kicked off.
I read that Warren Buffet has liquidated his assets for 350billion dollars, that would make him richer than Musk.
Also Buffets wealth is in hard cash while Musk appears to be a paper billionaire.

There was some guru wag on Bloomberg who said something like:what does that matter to you thought you didnt want the rich getting richer you should be happy

Trickle down theory.There was some guru wag on Bloomberg who said something like:
You need those rich people. They make things work.
If you took all the money from the rich people
and gave it to the poor people
you'd have a lot more poor people.
Discuss for homework.....

Nobody wants that.If you took all the money from the rich people
and gave it to the poor people
you'd have a lot more poor people.
Discuss for homework.....
I guess you don’t know it’s possible to make more money and faster by wealth destruction than wealth creation….if you are richwhat does that matter to you thought you didnt want the rich getting richer you should be happy
“There is only a sparse handful of exceedingly rich countries that could begin to afford to maintain the bulimically wasteful expense of an American democracy.”Trickle down theory.
Doesn't work.
And I am not advocating sharing all the wealth around to make everybody equal, that doesn't work either.
What is needed is very simple, a wage that people can live properly on. A fair days work should equal a fair days pay, and people will spend that money on the goods being made and sold and the cycle can keep going on. Make it so that people can't afford to buy and it is very short term wealth for the few.
Look where we are right now for the proof. People working but can't afford anything other than cheap stuff just to exist on. Business can't survive and progress if there is no market .
Trickle down theory.
except in the case of Trump who remains the only man to start with a billion and end up with a million without the fuss of buying a footballs club.The example is not "trickle down theory".
The point is that (a sizeable portion) of the framework in which people better themselves comes from the efforts of "the rich".
Nobody wants that.
Do I get an A*?
Strawman argument.There was some guru wag on Bloomberg who said something like:
You need those rich people. They make things work.
If you took all the money from the rich people
and gave it to the poor people
you'd have a lot more poor people.
Discuss for homework.....