Under English law
- Thread starter transam
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Knock yerself out.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,278
- Reaction score
- 2,107
- Country
It's not strictly true.
Rights exist in the performance , the works and the recording.
So if I recorded you speaking, I would own the recording, but you would own the performance and the works, if you could establish it is a performance and not just you speaking. I would need your consent https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/part/II/chapter/2/crossheading/performers-rights
In the case of someones voice recorded to scam you, then it's straight forward Fraud and copyright doesn't really come in to it. Now given that in order to trick your relative in to recording my script, in order to trick you, I'd probably have got their consent, but it would be not in accordance with the consent and therefore, you have both works/performance and a lack of consent.
Easier just to prosecute for the Fraud, unless of course your relative is in on it
Rights exist in the performance , the works and the recording.
So if I recorded you speaking, I would own the recording, but you would own the performance and the works, if you could establish it is a performance and not just you speaking. I would need your consent https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/part/II/chapter/2/crossheading/performers-rights
In the case of someones voice recorded to scam you, then it's straight forward Fraud and copyright doesn't really come in to it. Now given that in order to trick your relative in to recording my script, in order to trick you, I'd probably have got their consent, but it would be not in accordance with the consent and therefore, you have both works/performance and a lack of consent.
Easier just to prosecute for the Fraud, unless of course your relative is in on it
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,278
- Reaction score
- 2,107
- Country
So its mimicking the other person?
To what end? deception? for what gain? Fraud?
To what end? deception? for what gain? Fraud?
B
Brigade77
Are you in drink?
Off to bed with you, before you confirm to the internets that you ****.
potentially but you think it’s some one else they are not saying they are that person
you just assume they are the person you know
apparently in the states they are looking at a law that gives a person legal title to there voice ??
so they said on the programme any way
no I don’t drink don’t judge every body by yer own life style
get yer self off to bed you ignorant
T**t
no I don’t drink don’t judge every body by yer own life style
get yer self off to bed you ignorant
T**t
sbd make sure you put boxing gloves on
yer ignorance is caused by excessive self abuse
should have capitals as you are probably deaf
and poor eye sight
B
Brigade77
no I don’t drink don’t judge every body by yer own life style
get yer self off to bed you ignorant
T**t
If you not in drink . . . Then you terminally bewildered !
My god, these ****s walks amongst us.
Do you think that ****s like you should be given a voice as powerfull as soshal meedya?
says you
blimey what’s holding your ears apart
well what ever it is a good laxative will shift it
and lay off the Irn Bru
B
Brigade77
There are one or two voices that are worth £millions when they narrate an advertisement.
Why? I don't know why. Tom Hanks, David Jason, Morgan Freeman etc, etc don't actually use the products & their voices cost £millions.
If you think it the voice advertising something to you belongs to someone you know then usually you are wrong. Do you feel silly having to have that pointed out to you?
Morgan Freeman does NOT sell insurance policies on radio Norwich.
Why? I don't know why. Tom Hanks, David Jason, Morgan Freeman etc, etc don't actually use the products & their voices cost £millions.
If you think it the voice advertising something to you belongs to someone you know then usually you are wrong. Do you feel silly having to have that pointed out to you?
Morgan Freeman does NOT sell insurance policies on radio Norwich.
take it up with the people and the lawyer on English law speaking on the programme
under English law you have no legal right to your voice
but no doubt you are probably some expert on the subject
like every thing else you rabbit on about
Sponsored Links
