Have they been armed to take down Hamas, who Israel previously funded.
Last edited:
Zion and the Art of Armageddon
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
Have they been armed to take down Hamas, who Israel previously funded.
The bandit gangs have been armed in an attempt to destroy the Palestinian nation and prevent its recovery
Israel boasted of murdering Palestinian police escorting an aid convoy
Israel kills paramedics and firemen
The destroy water systems and sewage works
They kill farmers and farm animals
They bulldoze fire engines, ambulances and the corpses of emergency service workers into a hole in the ground.
Israel boasted of murdering Palestinian police escorting an aid convoy
Israel kills paramedics and firemen
The destroy water systems and sewage works
They kill farmers and farm animals
They bulldoze fire engines, ambulances and the corpses of emergency service workers into a hole in the ground.
The news that the UK has placed sanctions on Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich for inciting violence against Palestinians; joining Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway, is welcomed with the usual cries of anti-semitism from the Zionist regime. In a joint statement they say “We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution and will continue to work with our partners towards its implementation." - Ben-Gvir said: “We passed Pharaoh, we will also pass Starmer’s wall.” Which may give him ideas on controlling illegal immigration. A win-win.
"For inciting violence against the Palestinians"
Meanwhile, those who are actually carrying out the violence seem to get off the hook.
Typical British government hypocrisy:
You can do the bad thing, but don't you dare say the bad thing!
No historical evidence that the Jews were ever in Egypt.
If they had been, they would have probably sued Egypt for compensation by now.
The story about the Jews being slaves in Egypt comes from the bible.
600,000 Jewish males along with their families were supposed to have lived in Egypt for 400 years, a population of that size would have left an indelible footprint on the history of Egypt, there is nothing in the records kept by the ancient Egyptians to confirm this.
Sources and parallels of the Exodus - Wikipedia
Tell me the story about the talking snake and the magic rib-woman.
from your link:The story about the Jews being slaves in Egypt comes from the bible.
600,000 Jewish males along with their families were supposed to have lived in Egypt for 400 years, a population of that size would have left an indelible footprint on the history of Egypt, there is nothing in the records kept by the ancient Egyptians to confirm this.
Sources and parallels of the Exodus - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
While a few scholars continue to discuss the historicity, or at least plausibility, of the exodus story, the majority of archaeologists have abandoned it, in the phrase used by archaeologist William Dever, as "a fruitless pursuit"
So we're into a conspiracy thread...or perhaps they were all assumed into Heaven as God's Chosen?
I'd give the tale careful consideration, particularly concerning the new religion of the Jews which abandoned idolatry in favour of a singular God, which could assume Moses as a priest of Aten fleeing the vengeance of the old Egyptian caste who reinstated their many gods after the death of Akhenaten and his mad Sun-God cult.
There was nothing preemptive about the Israeli assault on Iranian military and civilian infrastructure and officials.
Ori Goldberg
A number of justifications have been broadcast to the Israeli public, but none explains the true reasons why the Israeli government decided to carry out the unilateral, unprovoked assault. The Israeli government claims that the strike was a “preventive” one, meant to address an immediate, inevitable threat on Iran’s part to construct a nuclear bomb. There appears to be no evidence for this claim. Israel’s strike was undoubtedly meticulously planned over a long period of time. A preventive attack must carry an element of self-defence, which, in turn, is generated by an emergency. No such emergency appears to have occurred.
Additionally, Israel has suggested that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report released on June 12 that condemned Iran for material violations of its Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) commitments until the early 2000s constitutes such an emergency. But even the IAEA seems to reject that claim. There was nothing in the report that was not already known to the relevant parties. The Israeli government has also suggested, in direct relation to the notion of a “preventive” strike, that it aimed to “decapitate” Iran’s nuclear programme. It is generally agreed by scholars and policymakers that Israel lacks the ability to destroy the programme, especially if it attempts to carry out such a strike on its own.
So, what drove the attack? Amid the genocidal campaign in Gaza, Netanyahu is very much aware that his government is running out of options. The international community, as well as regional allies, have started to criticise Israel vocally. Some have also been preparing to carry out unilateral measures, like the mass recognition of a Palestinian state. The International Criminal Court’s warrant of arrest for Netanyahu is looming, and the decision of the International Court of Justice about the legality of Israel’s occupation is waiting to be fulfilled. Israel and its military have continuously carried out massacres, denied them, and have been found to be lying.
There is no doubt that Netanyahu planned the strike on Iran for years, waiting for just the right time. This time came on Friday. It is a desperate attempt to rally the world behind Israel, just as preparations are made to deny it the absolute impunity it has enjoyed since its creation.
Will this be Netanyahu’s salvation? Will the Israeli public forgive him for his abject failures at home and horrid transgressions in Gaza? When observing the current sense of jubilation in public Israeli discourse, this may very well be the case. The long lines stretching from every open store, hardware to food, demonstrate that Israelis have entered blank survival mode. A docile citizenry may be good for Netanyahu, but it portends ill for any attempt to build and defend a robust Israeli society.
Ori Goldberg
A number of justifications have been broadcast to the Israeli public, but none explains the true reasons why the Israeli government decided to carry out the unilateral, unprovoked assault. The Israeli government claims that the strike was a “preventive” one, meant to address an immediate, inevitable threat on Iran’s part to construct a nuclear bomb. There appears to be no evidence for this claim. Israel’s strike was undoubtedly meticulously planned over a long period of time. A preventive attack must carry an element of self-defence, which, in turn, is generated by an emergency. No such emergency appears to have occurred.
Additionally, Israel has suggested that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report released on June 12 that condemned Iran for material violations of its Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) commitments until the early 2000s constitutes such an emergency. But even the IAEA seems to reject that claim. There was nothing in the report that was not already known to the relevant parties. The Israeli government has also suggested, in direct relation to the notion of a “preventive” strike, that it aimed to “decapitate” Iran’s nuclear programme. It is generally agreed by scholars and policymakers that Israel lacks the ability to destroy the programme, especially if it attempts to carry out such a strike on its own.
So, what drove the attack? Amid the genocidal campaign in Gaza, Netanyahu is very much aware that his government is running out of options. The international community, as well as regional allies, have started to criticise Israel vocally. Some have also been preparing to carry out unilateral measures, like the mass recognition of a Palestinian state. The International Criminal Court’s warrant of arrest for Netanyahu is looming, and the decision of the International Court of Justice about the legality of Israel’s occupation is waiting to be fulfilled. Israel and its military have continuously carried out massacres, denied them, and have been found to be lying.
There is no doubt that Netanyahu planned the strike on Iran for years, waiting for just the right time. This time came on Friday. It is a desperate attempt to rally the world behind Israel, just as preparations are made to deny it the absolute impunity it has enjoyed since its creation.
Will this be Netanyahu’s salvation? Will the Israeli public forgive him for his abject failures at home and horrid transgressions in Gaza? When observing the current sense of jubilation in public Israeli discourse, this may very well be the case. The long lines stretching from every open store, hardware to food, demonstrate that Israelis have entered blank survival mode. A docile citizenry may be good for Netanyahu, but it portends ill for any attempt to build and defend a robust Israeli society.
“The Israeli government, since the creation of the state, didn’t invest in one public shelter for the Arab part of society,” Tamra’s mayor, Mussa Abu Rumi, said. The reinforced “safe rooms” in new-build houses are an inferior alternative, as the fate of the Khatibs showed, and Abu Rumi said only 40% of Tamra residents even have those.
While missile strike sites in Tel Aviv, Rishon ReZion and Bat Yam have been flooded with rescue workers, home front troops, police and volunteers, most of the clear-up in Tamra was done by neighbours and a handful of municipal workers.
but not surprising.
I actually was surprised. I don't follow this a lot. But I have been told that Arab citizens of Israel are treated with respect.