If the jabs are so successful...

If he's a 'youngster' in his early 40's, double jabbed with a booster, he has a very good chance of just suffering symptoms similar to a cold at worse. Fingers crossed for him although I don't think he'll need it. (y)
 
Sponsored Links
He's Health worker and only tested positive today so early days

Best of luck, I'm sure he'll be fine. My son had it a few weeks ago and his pregnant wife then caught it. He is 32 and double jabbed as an NHS worker but he was quite ill. Not requiring hospital treatment but it did have an effect for some time. Definitely not just the cold.
 
I hope the pregnant wife has been jabbed.

Yes, double jabbed primary school school teacher, who is due to have our first granddaughter anytime soon. She wasn't as badly affected as my son.
 
Sponsored Links
some posts have been removed./QUOTE]
Why not? Not all of them guarantee 100% immunity. What most of them can do is give initial immunity and a fighting chance of not dying if you catch it providing you don't have any underlying heath problems. A flu jab is yearly. A tetanus jab needs repeating as do many others including covid 19. I don't think you quite get the concept of vaccines.
 
some posts have been removed.

there has been a massive drop in the rate of hospitalisations following infection.

the vaccines are a massive success.

I am sorry if you are suffering a comprehension deficit and can’t understand the evidence.


I guess you aren’t vaccinated and the reason your are spouting total nonsense.

it’s the unvaccinated idiots that are selfishly extending the pandemic.
 
Massive success so your told , more people dying and in hospital now compared to same period last year when no vaccine about

Utter nonsense from gassy.

A deliberate lie.
 
I have already disproved all the evidence you put up to support your assertion.
 
so put the figures up from aug sept last year to this year and prove me wrong
Cases last October 1st compared to this October 1st 7 day averages.
6,259 Vs 34,305

Last October 20th compared to this October 20th 7 day averages.
Deaths: 136 vs 136.

So, massively more sick people and the same number of deaths. Since most of those deaths are in unvaccinated people it's a pretty good sign the vaccines are working.

And to be clear, proof you're lying.
 
Last edited:
The worry that I have with the current strategy is the sheer numbers of cases. A new and potentially more deadly variant is probably imminent with such a carefree attitude to rising case numbers.
Certainly the vaccine prevents serious illness and deaths, but it has little effect, and maybe even a malignant influence, on the development of new variants.
 

Think for yourself, stop believing all this garbage you come up with.

https://www.logically.ai/articles/actors-behind-uk-misinformation-site-the-daily-expose

"The Daily Expose is a U.K.-focused conspiracy site created in November of last year, and since its establishment, it has promoted a standard portfolio of COVID-denialist, anti-vaxxer, and Great Reset myths framed as breaking news."

https://www.chillfiltr.com/exposing-daily-expose-a-beginner-course-in-spotting-dishonest-media
 
regardless of what site it is the figures are straight from public health scotland which can easily be checked

So what. Is it really breaking news that most people dying have been vaccinated. You do realise that if 100% are vaccinated then 100% of people dying will have been vaccinated?

_118172237__118158782_fbdafbe7-92ed-4e1a-bf4a-016d0f7ef06c-nc.png
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top