87 year old stabbed to death?!?

They've asserted they're being treated like prisoners. Has it been proven they are? Can you point me to the evidence? Or are you just taking their word for it?
surely an immigrant-hating racist keeps up with factual news?

"The Home Office's decision to house cross-channel migrants in a "squalid" barracks in Folkestone was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Six asylum seekers brought the case, claiming Napier Barracks was "unsafe" and dormitory use caused a Covid-19 outbreak earlier this year."

"Mr Justice Linden also criticised the "detention-like" setting for the men.
He said: "They were supposed to live voluntarily pending a determination of their applications for asylum.

"When this is considered, a decision that accommodation in a detention-like setting - a site enclosed by a perimeter fence topped with barbed wire, access to which is through padlocked gates guarded by uniformed security personnel - will be adequate for their needs, begins to look questionable."
 
Sponsored Links
surely an immigrant-hating racist keeps up with factual news?

"The Home Office's decision to house cross-channel migrants in a "squalid" barracks in Folkestone was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Six asylum seekers brought the case, claiming Napier Barracks was "unsafe" and dormitory use caused a Covid-19 outbreak earlier this year."

"Mr Justice Linden also criticised the "detention-like" setting for the men.
He said: "They were supposed to live voluntarily pending a determination of their applications for asylum.

"When this is considered, a decision that accommodation in a detention-like setting - a site enclosed by a perimeter fence topped with barbed wire, access to which is through padlocked gates guarded by uniformed security personnel - will be adequate for their needs, begins to look questionable."

Well there you go than

Hence Rwanda ;)
 
Seeing as most of the refugees in circulation are muslims, it is right that most of the countries in that list are muslim. Western countries should only take Christian refugees.

surely you don't consider yourself a christian?

if you were you wouldn't spout such nonsense.

Find yourself a Christian and ask her to tell you about the Sermon on the Mount.

Muslims.jpg
 
It's almost laugh out loud funny when you get labeled some sort of 'ist' just because you don't subscribe to what can be classed as more extreme left wing garbage.

Of course, law of averages etc, some people will base their views on their own prejudice as opposed to rational thought. That's not me. Example, when talking about Scottish independence, some (hopefully most) of those in favour will base their reasons on balanced reasons. Some (hopefully a minority) will say 'cause I hate the English, simple as that!'

This will always happen on major subjects.

When it comes to folk entering this country through unofficial routes, it matters not a jot to me what country they are from, what colour they are, what religion they are etc. I simply don't agree with people entering our country in this manner, especially when we're not the first country that can give them shelter.

Now, back to my Scottish independence example. Yes, some people won't want these people coming in simply because they are black/brown. However believe it or not, that's not all of us. We're not all bigoted racists just because we don't agree with something that affecting our country ;)
 
Sponsored Links
surely an immigrant-hating racist keeps up with factual news?

"The Home Office's decision to house cross-channel migrants in a "squalid" barracks in Folkestone was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Six asylum seekers brought the case, claiming Napier Barracks was "unsafe" and dormitory use caused a Covid-19 outbreak earlier this year."

"Mr Justice Linden also criticised the "detention-like" setting for the men.
He said: "They were supposed to live voluntarily pending a determination of their applications for asylum.

"When this is considered, a decision that accommodation in a detention-like setting - a site enclosed by a perimeter fence topped with barbed wire, access to which is through padlocked gates guarded by uniformed security personnel - will be adequate for their needs, begins to look questionable."

Make them sleep on the streets like they do in France.
 
Person A: Tbh I'd prefer we don't start accepting woman as members of our 'men meet in a hut once a week to drink and put the world to rights' group. I kind of like it as it is.

Person B: Ewwww, what a disgusting individual you are! What a sexist piece of scum you are!! You obviously HATE all females!! Shame on you!!!
 
Person A: Tbh I'd prefer we don't start accepting woman as members of our 'men meet in a hut once a week to drink and put the world to rights' group. I kind of like it as it is.

Person B: Ewwww, what a disgusting individual you are! What a sexist piece of scum you are!! You obviously HATE all females!! Shame on you!!!
Fairly apt for the moron right wing on here. Thanks for posting.(y)
 
Well feel
Free to step up to the plate noseall

You got a spare room ?
:ROFLMAO: you can house a migrant set an example and do the decent thing ?
Wife. - two sprogs - with two girlfriends. Sorry boyo. I’ll keep on the lookout for sad lonely singles living alone in multi bedroom houses though. I’ll be sure to vet them to make sure there are no engines on dining tables, or crappy cars out front propped up on bricks. (y)
 
I simply don't agree with people entering our country in this manner, especially when we're not the first country that can give them shelter.
So you think asylum seekers should be someone else's problem? Just not that of the UK?
 
So you think asylum seekers should be someone else's problem? Just not that of the UK?
This is my last comment to you on this cause it's evident we'll never agree and I can't be bothered with backwards and forwards 1000 times, gets boring.

Some people in the UK don't see a problem with people coming across from France in dingies. Some do, for a whole load of reasons. I'm in the latter camp.

Some people give the impression they'd be happy with any (unlimited) number of people coming into our country this way. Heck, the more the merrier, we should be aiming to be TOP of all those tables that show who's taking who. Some people don't agree with this. I'm in the latter camp.

It's interesting that people say things like 'they traverse three or four countries to get here to be with their family.' In some cases that may indeed be true, so where does that end? We have family member A coming in. Then B comes in cause they're related to A. Then C comes in cause they're related to B. And so on.

How should they get in to the UK? Once they've fled their war-torn country or other tragic situation, apply from the first country that's given you refuge and wait to see if your application is successful.

Btw, you know diddly squat about me. You base your perceptions on the things I type on this forum. Take some time and go through my posts over the years and see how many you can find that are filled with hate and 'isms.' Yes, I post my thoughts on various things and those thoughts don't always fit with the left wing narrative. However that doesn't make me the horrific person you're trying to paint me as.

This is the (very) sad situation we're in these days in the UK. If you don't align with various narratives (like JK Rowling on the trans stuff) you immediately get labelled in some shape or form.

I think we should leave the country in the control of the extreme left wingers ... it will be very interesting to see the state it's in a decade later if not before.
 
there have always been racists who hate refugees

always were

always will be

they haven't changed

one of these cartoons is from a racist Nazi paper

called the daily mail

and one is from a German paper.

NaziCartoon.jpg
MailNaziCartoon.jpg


p.s.
the cartoonist in the modern-day British Daily Mail is more skilled than the German one was.

but the message is the same.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top