COVID vaccines and heart attack risk revealed

[Notch7]

Can you prove that? Or another gut feeling

GS never stops

its best to keep at least 2 metres from anti vaxxers because they are idiots.

idiocy is apparently not contagious, it just shows up the shocking number of adults who have a complete inability to apply critical thinking to science............odd really since as a plumber I wouldve thought you must have reasonable analytical skills

 

[Notch7]

It's called science. Learning evolves with new diseases, we understand them more as time goes by. What happened in the early days is not necessarily what we do now. We don't get kids to clean chimneys any more.

anti vaxxers cling to their "oh they changed advice" for dear life

false arguments are all they have and that one of their default arguments for sure -if you take it away from them they will start grizzling

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Would I give a hug to someone with ebola? - no!

Everything else is flannel .

But this line. Why wouldn't you? To avoid catching it?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

poor Ellal lacks the ability to understand that viral load emitted from an infected person drops off as the distance is increased

It's basic stuff.

The action has been around decades and centuries, but he still disputes it

 

[ellal]

poor Ellal lacks the ability to understand that viral load emitted from an infected person drops off as the distance is increased

And yet you too refuse to say what distance you feel comfortable with...

Surely those who are great fans of the jabs (worship them?) should have a definitive answer to that?

If not, why not?

I've been unequivocal about my opinion

 

[carmanmemoranda]

And yet you too refuse to say what distance you feel comfortable with...

Surely those who are great fans of the jabs (worship them?) should have a definitive answer to that?

If not, why not?

I've been unequivocal about my opinion

You've got it the wrong way round, but I'm not surprised.

You wouldn't hug somebody with ebola, presumably to avoid catching it.

If so, you are just 1 step away from understanding that keeping your distance was (and if another new disease started tomorrow), still is. good advice.

 

[ellal]

It's called science. Learning evolves with new diseases, we understand them more as time goes by. What happened in the early days is not necessarily what we do now. We don't get kids to clean chimneys any more.

Depends what science you believe in during those early days...

An older friend of ours ran an HMO when AIDS first appeared...

There was an openly gay guy staying there, so naturally our friend was concerned and went to see her GP...

And she was told that as long as she didn't have unprotected sex with the guy or share a razor, then nothing to worry about...

Sorted!

Stupid analogy about kids in chimneys btw

 

[ellal]

You've got it the wrong way round, but I'm not surprised.

You wouldn't hug somebody with ebola, presumably to avoid catching it.

If so, you are just 1 step away from understanding that keeping your distance was (and if another new disease started tomorrow), still is. good advice.

So you still won't answer the very simple distance question...

Therefore let's try a simpler approach...

Given that the 'virus' is apparently still amongst us, do you avoid shaking hands with people in whatever situation you may find yourself in?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

So you still won't answer the very simple distance question...

Therefore let's try a simpler approach...

Given that the 'virus' is apparently still amongst us, do you avoid shaking hands with people in whatever situation you may find yourself in?

I try not to get close to most people i meet.

I certainly thought it was a good idea to keep as much distance as possible in the early days of the virus, until the vaccines came about and reduced the risk.

Do you get close and hug most people?

Or do you think distance in general is just a basic common sense good idea that's stood the test over generstions

 

[ellal]

its best to keep at least 2 metres from anti vaxxers because they are idiots.

Wow, that's a scientific approach

But why do jab junkies have a problem with human contact, because after all they have had their magic potions that they have been told will protect them

 

[Mottie]

..

But why do jab junkies have a problem with human contact,

I try to keep at least one scaffold poles length away from anyone I take a dislike to.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Wow, that's a scientific approach

But why do jab junkies have a problem with human contact, because after all they have had their magic potions that they have been told will protect them

You really do try and make 2 + 2 = 5.

Is distance a good idea, or not, you haven't answered yet. Too difficult, or too simple ?

 

[Brigadier]

Wow, that's a scientific approach

But why do jab junkies have a problem with human contact, because after all they have had their magic potions that they have been told will protect them

I keep a bit of distance from people I don't know, mainly because once you realise they have poor personal hygiene, and/or breath that would knock a fly off a bucket of shoite, it's already too late to stop the gag reflex

 

[ellal]

I try not to get close to most people i meet.

That explains a lot...

Do you avoid concerts, sports events, public transport etc?

Do you get close and hug most people?

If appropriate, yes...

And I've retained the courtesy of shaking a person's hand and did so throughout...

Or do you think distance in general is just a basic common sense good idea that's stood the test over generstions

For a known contagious serious illness, then obviously yes...

But being paranoid over a possible threat - no!

If you have young children/grandchildren, do you avoid hugging them during the winter cold season?

And as for that 'test over generations', have you ever heard about 'chicken pox parties'?
They still go on albeit less so nowadays btw!

 

[ellal]

Is distance a good idea, or not, you haven't answered yet. Too difficult, or too simple ?

Yes I have...

You just don't like the answer

2 + 2 = 5.

No wonder you have a problem answering the distance question