Instead of locking threads,, just ban Rogue Hanger the troll

But when we bemoan the freeloading foreigners you call us racists. Make your mind up fella. :rolleyes:
I criticise posts that outwardly blame foreign people and immigration for all our financial and employment woes when it is not true and when the problem is closer to home.

As for accusing those people of being racist - The KKK would be proud of some of the posting on the Generally Disgusting section.
 
Sponsored Links
But when we bemoan the freeloading foreigners you call us racists. Make your mind up fella. :rolleyes:
I criticise posts that outwardly blame foreign people and immigration for all our financial and employment woes when it is not true and when the problem is closer to home.

As for accusing those people of being racist - The KKK would be proud of some of the posting on the Generally Disgusting section.

We can't deport the home grown problem (though we could train them to do trades like we used to), but we SHOULD be able to refuse entry to those that have no realistic expectation of finding employment in a modern society. Do you agree? If not. then why not?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JBR
Sponsored Links
We can't deport the home grown problem (though we could train them to do trades like we used to), but we SHOULD be able to refuse entry to those that have no realistic expectation of finding employment in a modern society. Do you agree? If not. then why not?

Blimey, talk about ganging up to hurl abusive comments. 'Cos let's face it, that's all they were, four pages of abuse and not a scrap of real evidence in any of those posts. Just urban myths and racially motivated biases.
I don't consider biased newspaper reports as hard evidence. They are exactly that, sensationalism. It's what sells newspapers and you lot buy 'em to garner some vague hope of reinforcing your biases. :rolleyes:

At least noseall referred to a real hard piece of evidence: immigration has been good for UK. So many millions of jobs created, lower unemployment amongst indigenous workers, etc.
If immigration was stopped tomorrow, some major infrastructue organisations would struggle to maintain staffing levels. For instance, I suspect the NHS to have something over 50% immigrant workers, that's first generation immigrants. If we considered 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants, I suspect the figure would be closer to 90%. And of course if we went any further back, the % of "indigenous workers" would be infinitesimally small.

To address joe's point precisely: when we train kids in school, can we, could we screen out those that will go on to higher and geater things and discard those that will end up as ne'er-do-wells? Of course we can't. Similarly, we could allow only highly skilled/qualified immigrants to enter UK. Who's to say that those new immigrants will use their high intelligence, high qualifications for the benefit of society or not. Of course we can't, we can only hope, just like we do with any bright kids in school.

But the rules do try to accomodate some discrimination (using the word in its literal sense, not in its racial sense) by setting some time limits before any social welfare can be claimed, just like other EU countries. For those that claim other EU countries apply rules and we don't. Check your facts first, there are rules, may be different rules, but they are there.

Additionally, when you see a non-white person, or hear a non-UK accent on the street, you have no idea whether they are 1st, or 2nd generation immigrant, or even further removed from the original immigrant. They may have been born here, get used to it! They have as much right to be here as you! And they probably have a more level headed attitude than you and will probably go on to greater achievements than you. Some pobably already have.

Moreoever, there are so many kids these days from mixed parentage, that I suspect that pure British, or even anglo-saxon is a myth.
There's probably loads of others that you assume are indigenous because of their skin colour, yet they originate from caucasion countries. Therefore you form the flawed perception that non-white, non-UK accents are responsible for the social ills of UK. In reality you have no idea where your neighbour, or their parents, or their grandparents originated from.


Joe suggested we refuse entry to those that have no hope of finding work. Yeah, that'll work. You can come to work but you can't bring your kids or your misses with you. :rolleyes: And leave the pets, you can't bring them. :rolleyes:

You're all fitting nicely into the categories of "long-term depression" or "hard-pressed anxiety". You're resenting the competition for social welfare payments or you're serial strugglers. :LOL: :LOL:

BTW, I see Dex was drunk rather early. At least that's what I assume, judging by his own admissions, because he resorted to the use of discriminatoy terms. :rolleyes: What hope for our education system when the teachers lose control? :rolleyes:

BTW, I'm pleased to see joe out of his shell and flying his flag again. :LOL: :LOL:
 
If immigration was stopped tomorrow, some major infrastructue organisations would struggle to maintain staffing levels. For instance, I suspect the NHS to have something over 50% immigrant workers, that's first generation immigrants.

OK, I've finally got round to checking my own figures (At least I practise what I preach) :mad:
I over-guestimated.
The NHS has 37% of migrant doctors and there's about 23% migrant nurses.

http://news.sky.com/story/1155532/nhs-has-immigration-saved-the-health-service

http://www.nhsconfed.org/priorities/political-engagement/Pages/NHS-statistics.aspx

First link gives us 85,000 migrant nurses and 37% migrant doctors, second link gives us 370,000 nurses.

So, if those EDL/BNP/KKK members would kindly refuse treatment by NHS migrant staff............................. :LOL: :LOL:
and I'm just talking 1st generation migrant nurses and doctors. I suspect the other kinds of staff tells an even more telling picture. (only 50% of staff in NHS are qualified staff.)

And that's just one insitution!

What has migration done for UK :?:
 
Of course, The UK must be desperately short of unskilled/low skilled labour. So short that we need to import extra millions from The EU and further afield.

Employers, including the NHS, are so desperate to attract staff to fill all of these vacancies that they have to go as far as offering the minimum wage and zero hours contracts. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Sounds like someone has been swallowing all of the government lies and platitudes. :rolleyes:

It must be true. I read it in the hand-wringers' favourite rag.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/apr/02/rise-staff-zero-hour-contracts

http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/jul/30/army-workers-zero-hours-contracts
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JBR
Of course, The UK must be desperately short of unskilled/low skilled labour. So short that we need to import extra millions from The EU and further afield.
I'll get round to your point in a minute, even though you can only quote from newpapers. :rolleyes:
My sources are "from the horses mouth".

A further source, Migration Watch, declares itself as: "We are an independent, voluntary, non political body which is concerned about the present scale of immigration into the UK."

Yeah, that's like saying UKIP is an independent, unbiased party. :rolleyes:
However, from their website:
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org.uk/

We can do a ball-park, back-of-a-fag-packet calculation, using their figures, 'cos the government never really had any reliable figures:
Assuming 150,000 net migration p.a. (just a guestimate of an average by visual observation) over about 20 years (I appreciate the last couple of years are missing from the graph) That's a cumulative total of 3,000,000 net migration over the last 20 years.

Tremble in yer boots, yer being overrun with immigrants. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Now to the point raised by the KKK wizard. :rolleyes:
From the same Migration Watch Website. Don't forget this is the unbiased website that is concened about immigration. :rolleyes:
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org.uk/briefingPaper/document/256

4 The NHS has been heavily dependent on migrant labour for a number of reasons, some long-standing, others of more recent origin:...../

5 In some cases, expertise to the required standard in some clinical fields can only be sourced from abroad............/

6 The NHS is very heavily dependent on medical and other healthcare professionals who qualified outside Europe........./

etc. etc.

Read it yourself instead of your biased comics. :rolleyes:
Any big words that you don't understand, just ask, we'll explain them to you. :LOL: :LOL:

So, the "extra millions that we are importing" :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Well, I gave you the benefit of the doubt before, I called you a half-wit, but if you're going to exagerate................... :LOL: :LOL:

Just admit it, your prejudices are affecting your thinking. What little of it there is. :LOL: :LOL:
 
As usual, a weak argument supported by insults - from the person who complains about insults made on here. :rolleyes: I notice that you only focus on the NHS, whilst I was referring to employers in general, including the NHS.

As you seem to have trouble grasping facts, the employment market is like any other market - driven by supply and demand. If employers are increasingly offering the minimum wage and zero hours contracts, supply of labour is obviously higer than demand.

Time to think about turning off the immigration taps, don't you think? Immigration has done nothing for this country, but drive down wages and conditions for the indigenous population and disincentivise governments and employers to train and employ millions of people who now languish on benefits.

Lefties like you sabotaged the education system to ensure that millions of Britons are unemployable and then made sure they remained unemployed by uncontrolled immigration. Completely barking piece of short-termism.
 
As you seem to have trouble grasping facts, the employment market is like any other market - driven by supply and demand. If employers are increasingly offering the minimum wage and zero hours contracts, supply of labour is obviously higer than demand.

I don't think you've quite got the grade to argue:
You're assuming that the labour market is a simple supply and demand market. Not so!
Either, when supply is high the sellers (those selling their labour) think that the price is high/good so there's more attracted to supplying/selling their labour. Or
the demand is low due to low investment causing lay-offs, redundancies, etc.
We're just coming out of such a recession when demand for labour has been reduced. Additionally the labour market is changing, you just haven't got the ability to keep up with it.
This changing labou market, does it encourage the indigenous unemployed to lower or reappraise their expectations. No chance. Those that are too busy blaming everyone and everything for their failure ensure that. So some jobs either go unfulfilled or migrant labour is employed.
Sometimes it's highly skilled labour that is required and can't be found in UK because the UK doesn't provide the necessary training. Even the BoE governor is a migrant. What does that tell you? Do you think he was employed because his demand for wages was lower. :rolleyes:
It's a cosmopolitan world. Learn to live in it.

Alternatively, when demand is high could be due to various influences, such as growing economy, natural shortages of specialised skills, shortages of appropriate training, etc.

Lefties like you sabotaged the education system to ensure that millions of Britons are unemployable and then made sure they remained unemployed by uncontrolled immigration.

So you blame the immigrants for your low station in life and now you blame the lefties for failing to educate you.
It's always someone else's fault that you're a ne'er do well. It's never your fault. :LOL: :LOL:
 
Hey RH? However did we survive before the European invasion? Oh that's right - we didn't - we all starved to death. :rolleyes:
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JBR
Hey RH? However did we survive before the European invasion? Oh that's right - we didn't - we all starved to death. :rolleyes:
You mean in the days when only one in ten families had a car or one in eight families had a washing machine or only one in four families had a tele, blah, blah blah.

Times change Joey and so do labour demands.

What a pi$$ poor analogy. :rolleyes:
 
Hey RH? However did we survive before the European invasion? Oh that's right - we didn't - we all starved to death. :rolleyes:
You mean in the days when only one in ten families had a car or one in eight families had a washing machine or only one in four families had a tele, blah, blah blah.

Times change Joey and so do labour demands.

What a pi$$ poor analogy. :rolleyes:

No I mean before 2004. Wake up fella. :rolleyes:
 
Have you met the Roma yet Nosey? Obviously not. :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top