Easy. They borrow the identity of a friend who is here legally in order to benefit from healthcare.
I thought that we were all equal?
- Thread starter Brigadier
- Start date
Easy. They borrow the identity of a friend who is here legally in order to benefit from healthcare.
Sponsored Links
depends on your definition off legally
australia was owned by the aborigines any one else is an uninvited immigrant
the same with america it belongs to the native indians any one else is an immigrant
if you think australia and america are good examples then you should embrace the hard working immigrants coming in to the uk
Good analogy. I wonder whether, in time, white anglo-saxon people will become protected minorities in Britistan.
depends on your definition off legally
australia was owned by the aborigines any one else is an uninvited immigrant
the same with america it belongs to the native indians any one else is an immigrant
if you think australia and america are good examples then you should embrace the hard working immigrants coming in to the uk
Good analogy. I wonder whether, in time, white anglo-saxon people will become protected minorities in Britistan.
Be along time happening, British WHITE People are 88.2 % of the population.
Cities make laws, people living in the countryside are practically irrelevant as far as law and politics is concerned.
Sponsored Links
government make laws
councils have no power what so ever other than to enforce the laws off the land that fall within there remit like parking littering dog fouling enviromental health ect
if you mean local policies rather than laws or local bylaws then yes you may be right i dont know
Whatever the rights and wrongs are of the pull factors that make asylum seekers (economic migrants) so desperate to get onto this island, I have always failed to see why their problems are the responsibility of the hard pressed British taxpayers anyway.
Asylum seems to mean that if half of Russia, for example, oppressed the other half of Russia, then 70 million people would theoretically be entitled to turn up here for support.
Asylum appears to be a blank cheque, and the trickle is in danger of turning into something that could end up as a flood if steps aren't taken to reduce the appeal of sneaking into Europe, and especially Britain.
Asylum seems to mean that if half of Russia, for example, oppressed the other half of Russia, then 70 million people would theoretically be entitled to turn up here for support.
Asylum appears to be a blank cheque, and the trickle is in danger of turning into something that could end up as a flood if steps aren't taken to reduce the appeal of sneaking into Europe, and especially Britain.
I have yet to see some real evidence that this is the correct percentage. Yes, I know, government statistics. But you are assuming two things:
1. the government have told us the truth, and have nothing to cover up;
2. there are NOT many illegal immigrants in this country whose number none of us know.
I'd like to think that the majority of people in Britain understand the problem and fear the future, but I suspect the opposite may be the case and that most people believe that UKIP and other eurosceptics are making a mountain out of a molehill. They, presumably, are content to sleepwalk into the inevitable.
The British are extremely tolerant and notoriously slow to rouse, but bearing in mind that both legal and illegal immigrants continue to flood into this country, and that 'certain elements of society' continue to breed like rabbits, and the stated 88.2% (even if true) will soon reduce to 50% or less.
The only consolation is that when we are too poor to provide generous handouts for all and sundry, Britain will lose its appeal and they'll all be off to some other generous country. Obviously, it will be a bit too late by then!
Sorry if I paint a pessimistic picture, but can you assure me that I am wrong?
Ahh, would this be the same "black economy" that the EU have suddenly taken into consideration, when handing the UK a demand for £1.7bn (payable on 1st December) ????
Why do people often ignore the obvious...
Britain colonised a large proportion of the third world and created a near universal language which makes it easier to survive in a country where they can speak the basics
depends on your definition off legally
australia was owned by the aborigines any one else is an uninvited immigrant
the same with america it belongs to the native indians any one else is an immigrant
if you think australia and america are good examples then you should embrace the hard working immigrants coming in to the uk
The first inhabitants of Australia were a people known as 'Negrito'. Not much is known about them but they existed thousands of years before the Aborigines. For years the accepted first inhabitants of the USA were the 'Clovis' people who crossed from Siberia thousands of years before the native 'Indians'. But archaeological evidence has now shown up of people before even their time so the clock goes back even further. Either way, it wasn't the Injuns.
Why do people often ignore the obvious...
Britain colonised a large proportion of the third world and created a near universal language which makes it easier to survive in a country where they can speak the basics
And yet they can speak fluently in their own language in their own country and have trouble surviving.
What does that tell you about these peoples?
The Romans fought them in the dark ages with the edge of a sword.
They just called them "Barbarians".
Seems such an appropriate label for a lot of them today.
D
Deleted member 63160
Tells me they couldn't organize a pop shot in a porno. Tells me that they are so dumb that when they find a better place they immediately want to ruin it to the same state of the place they escaped. Welcome to Islam. The biggest threat ever to modern civilisation.
Why do people often ignore the obvious...
Britain colonised a large proportion of the third world and created a near universal language which makes it easier to survive in a country where they can speak the basics
Oh FFS elly, give it a bloody rest. Didn't take long for you to blame our forefathers did it?
Why do people often ignore the obvious...
Britain colonised a large proportion of the third world and created a near universal language which makes it easier to survive in a country where they can speak the basics
Engage your brain - if English is universally-spoken, there's no need to traipse halfway around the world to get to the Motherland to hear it - it's all around you
Sponsored Links
