All these channel crossers seeking asylum..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
pointless abuse removed
I've given you a like for that comment because I'm sure the readers have their own experience and judgement on which to assess the truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The one way around this is to set up our Asylum headquarters in let's say Turkey.
Anyone applying for Asylum to this country has to apply in Turkey.
If they are picked up on the English channel or a UK beach, they will then be taken to Turkey to apply for Asylum

Not good for people traffickers and less deaths
 
Sponsored Links
...and I gave him a like because it's true.
It's your credibility that's at stake.
It's obvious to anyone with an ounce of intelligence what the real situation is about editing posts, which are the edited posts, and which are the original.
Motman accepts that both posts are his. It's just a question about which is the original and which is the subsequent edited post.

SammyInnit said:
Doesn't take a genius.
 
The one way around this is to set up our Asylum headquarters in let's say Turkey.
Anyone applying for Asylum to this country has to apply in Turkey.
If they are picked up on the English channel or a UK beach, they will then be taken to Turkey to apply for Asylum

Not good for people traffickers and less deaths
What would Turkey want for this?

The setting up of such transit camps has already been explored in other countries, without results, so far.
The suggested countries refuse to agree to it, not surprisingly.
How about we set up such camps in UK?
 
Membership to the EU?
They already have a very limited schengen access, (Turkey is working towards visa-free access to EU countries), and a customs union.

A CU and the CU

The EU-Turkey CU is a CU with the CU. Let us explain. The CU is the internal EU Customs Union (the EUCU) between its Member States. It is complete and covers all goods. The EU-Turkey CU is a separate customs union between Turkey and the EUCU.​
http://ukandeu.ac.uk/explainers/eu-turkey-customs-union/
This customs union has been in development since 1959!

It also means that UK would have to develop a new arrangement with Turkey for trade. But this is a digression.
 
Last edited:
inappropriate language removed

Well said ReganandCarter, millions would agree with you, apart from the usual snowflakes.
Send them ALL back, we've enough to do looking after our own,, we're full up we don't want them!! Send them back to France.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Send them ALL back, we've enough to do looking after our own,, we're full up we don't want them!! Send them back to France.
We've already established that is not a viable or legal option.
Unless, you prefer the non-viable, illegal options?
In which case I'd prefer the immigrants. They're probably more law-abiding.
 
Capital punishment was abolished in UK many years ago.
If you prefer a country that uses capital punishment, you should emigrate.

Capital punishment?? That's where many of them come from, and women are second class citizens!! Big trouble ahead not far way!!
 
Send them ALL back, we've enough to do looking after our own,, we're full up we don't want them!! Send them back to France.
We've already established that is not a viable or legal option.
Unless, you prefer the non-viable, illegal options?
In which case I'd prefer the immigrants. They're probably more law-abiding.

Send them all back, oh,, and more law abiding than who???
More law-abiding than those who choose to resort to illegal processes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top