The vast majority I believe, why else would they have a thousand odd people claiming to have seen it sign affidavits?
Traitor
- Thread starter sooey
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
Absolutely, I've been trying to explain that simple concept to this guy for I don't know how long. Either I'm a complete idiot or he is, I don't think it's me.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
Any evidence for that?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
Not really the point. The claim is that the votes were topped up over t'internet by adding the requisite number of votes from Italy through servers in Germany. Not real paper votes.
I was asking how subsequent hand recounts proved the number correct given they were claimed to be "not real" votes.
Sponsored Links
I think you may have answered your own question. A subsequent recount would not confirm or deny any of that, it would take a full audit.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
Of course it would. Side one claims there were 50,000 legitimate votes but side two claims there were only 30,000 legitimate votes and 20,000 fake internet votes. Three recounts are made, one of them a hand count, all confirm 50,000 legitimate votes. What's the problem?
What's an 'internet vote'?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
It's the claim by sooey, that he linked a video of, that there was interference from Italy through Germany remotely just to add votes.
No it isn't, you are referring to the claim by me that votes were sent to Italy over the internet, manipulated and sent back. They were also manipulated by an algorithm in the machines I believe.
But to use your example, if there were fifty thousand votes, forty thousand for Trump and ten thousand for sleepy Joe, and they were manipulated to twenty thousand for Trump and Thirty thousand for sleepy Joe, there would still be fifty thousand votes total after manipulation.
OK so online interference with the digital recording system. If, as has been suggested, paper votes were destroyed and new ones introduced, it's surely not beyond the wit of man to make the two tally is it?
I'm not suggesting for a moment that's what's happened, I don't know. But it would be a foolish man indeed to suggest electoral fraud doesn't exist, and an even more foolish man to suggest there isn't a global elite who for their interests want a say in who governs the world, and they have the wealth and power to dictate those outcomes, but only up to a point.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
Yes, but would be picked up after three recounts, one being manual. But of course we're all in on the conspiracy.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 2,106
- Country
Trump himself has said many times that if the audits are done in those swing states where he alleges the fraud mostly took place, and if they are found to be kosher, he will happily walk away and do something else, but he will never concede to a stolen election.
The big tell, which no one has given an answer to yet is this....
If Biden thinks that he won fair and square why isn't he shouting from the rooftops for those audits to be done out in the open for everyone to see.
It would be in his interests if that was the case to show the world that everything was right and that he is the legitimate president.
He will never do that, and that is why he will never unite the country behind him.
The big tell, which no one has given an answer to yet is this....
If Biden thinks that he won fair and square why isn't he shouting from the rooftops for those audits to be done out in the open for everyone to see.
It would be in his interests if that was the case to show the world that everything was right and that he is the legitimate president.
He will never do that, and that is why he will never unite the country behind him.
No, because they're only re-counting what's been recorded, but if there's a flaw or fraud in the recording method, that isn't going to be picked up by a recount. It might possibly be picked up by a full audit, which wont happen.
You obviously haven't seen the video of the recount, where two poll workers one a democrat and one a republican told the recount supervisor that they had found many ballots that all bore the same signature, I think it was.
They wanted to throw those ballots out but were told that they were only there to count the numbers, it wasn't their job to do an audit.
There was much arguing and in the end they had to comply with the recount supervisors instructions.
Tomorrow if I can be arsed, I'll dig it out.
Recounts without an audit mean nothing, you are just counting the same fraudulent ballots over again.
- Status
Sponsored Links
