Have you heard of Geert Vanden Bossche?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no idea, I'm not a virologist. But seeing as they have all been conceived and brought to market in a year or less I wouldn't trust any of them.
So, nothing to do with mRNA at all, you're so full of ****. :D
 
Sponsored Links
Why is this forum so populated with such utter, complete and disingenuous nobheads? Geert Vanden Bossche's message has everything to do with MRNA. You asked about the others and I said that I wouldn't trust any of them and told you why.
You are an arzehole, but you're in good company on here.
 
Why is this forum so populated with such utter, complete and disingenuous nobheads? Geert Vanden Bossche's message has everything to do with MRNA. You asked about the others and I said that I wouldn't trust any of them and told you why.
You are an arzehole, but you're in good company on here.
You have been ranting about how mRNA vaccines are going to install 5G modems in our DNA, or something equally bonkers, but you don't even know that not all the vaccines are mRNA based.

It's almost as good as when you tried to define asymptomatic transmission as when you sneeze on someone. No, that was better.

It's good to go to bed laughing, it sets you up well for the next day. Have a thanks.
 
Sponsored Links
You have been ranting about how mRNA vaccines are going to install 5G modems in our DNA, or something equally bonkers, but you don't even know that not all the vaccines are mRNA based.

I said you were a disingenuous nobhead, thanks for proving me so right so quickly.
 
So you are telling us that 195 countries all agreed on something...........:LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

Yes actually, that is exactly what I am telling you.

Agenda 21 (Agenda 2030)


Wikipedia defines the UN’s Agenda 21 as “An action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development”.

“Sustainable development” is the catch-phrase we should be afraid of, very afraid. Its plan dictates where one can live and what land should be designated for would, under fully-realized Agenda 21 plan, be controlled by the United Nations and a future one-world government.

The odd thing is that most people have simply not heard of Agenda 21 – although local authorities across the country, and government institutions across the world, at national and local level, have signed up to it. In fact nearly every country in the world has signed up for this fascist dictatorship.

Few political discussions are now taking place without some mention of whether Britain would be better served by removing itself from the EU. However our politicians and MSM seem strangely quiet about the real elephant in the room: UN – Agenda 21.

Perhaps the reason for this, is that its influence has now spread so widely into all government institutions throughout the World, without revealing to citizens the true nature and intentions of the agenda. Indeed it has now been adopted by many local councils in Britain as Local Agenda 21.

It was back in 1992 that the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro, and here 179 nations officially signed up to Agenda 21 — many more have followed since. Maurice Strong has been the driving force behind the imposition of Agenda 21, and was also a member of the UN’s Commission on Global Governance. Below are several quotes by Maurice Strong that I feel make scary reading.

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” (Founder of the UN Environment Programme)

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.” (At the Rio Earth Summit).

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that …. the threat of global warming would fit the bill ….. the real enemy then is humanity itself …..we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realise world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or …..one invented for the purpose.” (Maurice Strong at the Club of Rome)

Agenda 21 is actually a blueprint for the 21st century; which under the cover of environmentalism and scaremongering CAGW, is in fact, just communism resurrected in a new guise. It is clear to see, that with the various political parties producing their election manifestos, the Green Party is actually the “Agenda 21 Global Communist Party”. UKIP on the other hand offers us an escape route; as it is the only party which will repeal the ludicrous, suicidal, 2008 Climate Change Act.
 
Last edited:
Right, gotcha, climate change is also a con. Thanks Sooey. :D

If you can wait until lunchtime to explain why the moon landings were faked I've got a lot of work to do on some coving and I can always use a pick me up chuckle after that.
 
Why is this forum so populated with such utter, complete and disingenuous nobheads?
Sooey, you do know this is a DIY forum don’t you? Can you tell me how your theories are being received on the medical forums? Do you post your theories and pass on your vital information and video links that you have on such forums? Can you name them please - I’d like to take a look for myself to see what the medical profession say about them. Have you contacted the Lancet?
 
Some people have a phobia about travelling through the Channel Tunnel, they can manage that phobia by never traveling through the tunnel. They do not need to deny the existence of the Channel Tunnel.

Some people have a phobia of dying from Covid, they could manage that phobia by total avoidance of contact with other people. That is impossible unless they live in a totally self sufficient community producing it's food. The easy way to manage their phobia is to publicly deny the existence of Covid.
 
Yes actually, that is exactly what I am telling you

I understand now.
You've taken a few bits out of context to arrive at your nutty conclusion.

Obviously you don't believe global population has increased from around 2.5billion in 1940s to 7.5billion now.

Obviously you don't believe the massive amounts of natural habitats esp forestation that has disappeared due to man
 
Some people have a phobia of dying from Covid, they could manage that phobia by total avoidance of contact with other people. That is impossible unless they live in a totally self sufficient community producing it's food. The easy way to manage their phobia is to publicly deny the existence of Covid.

I would suggest that people who have a phobia about dying from covid would not be completely ignoring everything that fat buffoon in Downing st and his minions tell them they must do, and would not be going about their lives as normally as possible under the present circumstances.
They would be slavishly adhering to every illegal and unjustified restriction that has been placed upon them, while washing their hands franticlly every five minutes. And they would be telling people who don't share their irrational, media stoked fears that they are selfish and are going to bring doom upon us all.
 
Judging by the traffic on the roads I am glad to say that many others seem to see things as I do, and are giving the middle finger to this lock down cr*p.
 
Agenda 21, the great reset, the new world order, call it whatever you want, as long as we 'build back better'.

So, please explain how stopping a large part of the world's population from dying will help this agenda?
Surely a vaccine means fewer people die and more people stay in business, preventing this "reset".
 
middle finger to this lock down cr*p

We never really had a lockdown. Tabloids called it that, but it never happened. Nobody was ever forced to stay in their homes, people were not forced to work from home, it was always advisory. The only "lockdown" was temporary closure of schools, pubs, cafes etc.
 
What makes you think that these experimenta 'vaccines' are about preventing people from dying?
If I was an elderly patient n a nursing home I would be far more afraid of the experimental 'vaccine' than I would of covid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top