Some left wingers are so up themselves its almost beyond belief..

[JohnD]

adults who like winding Bob the gob up.

Trolls, you mean.

 

[Dangee]

Bob might take offence that you’ve sided with me. Welcome back from the dark side John.

 

[Vinty]

As Micky Flanagan said “no wonder the French eat snails, they’re so lazy it’s the only thing they can catch

Micky Flanagan is one of the funniest comedians around.

 

[JohnD]

Micky Flanagan is one of the funniest comedians around.

Will you be voting for him as future tory leader?

 

[fillyboy]

Micky Flanagan is one of the funniest comedians around.

Andrew Lawrence is the other one.

 

[johnny2007]

So what is the legal process for applying for asylum?
You procrastinate and swivel because you don't know, or can't bring yourself to admit that there isn't really a legal method of applying for asylum in UK.
Asylum seekers can't board a plane or a ship, or a train without a visa. The carrier will not allow them aboard. They can't apply for a visa if they can't prove that they can support themselves. They can apply for a visa in order to claim asylum. How successful do you think that would be? How long do you think UK will drag out that process? How long do you think the applicant will survive?
They could find their way to a refugee camp and hope that UK takes pity on them. But that is highly unlikely to be successful, if they survive the journey and the existence in the camp.
So, have a guess, what is the legal process for applying for asylum in UK?

To save you floundering around with your vacuous responses, there is only the one method: arrive in UK by some means, get caught, then apply.
It is called the illegal method by those, including the Nasty Party, who want to criminalise asylum seekers.

Here, as Mr Race Card keeps asking:

https://www.gov.uk/claim-asylum

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Here, as Mr Race Card keeps asking:

https://www.gov.uk/claim-asylum

Thank you. It took some consistent asking to get the answer.
From your link:

You must apply for asylum if you want to stay in the UK as a refugee.
To be eligible you must have left your country and be unable to go back because you fear persecution.
You should apply when you arrive in the UK or as soon as you think it would be unsafe for you to return to your own country. Your application is more likely to be denied if you wait.
When you apply you’ll have a meeting with an immigration officer (known as a ‘screening’).​

Therefore, by those criteria, all refugees crossing the channel. and hoping to be detected are using the only legal route.
Thus, the only illegal refugees are the ones who sneak into UK, and hope to avoid detection.

So can we now stop using the word 'illegal' to describe the refugees crossing the channel in dinghies, rubber/inflatable boats, etc?
They are the refugees using the only available legal route to seek asylum in UK.

​

 

[johnny2007]

Thank you. It took some consistent asking to get the answer.
From your link:

You must apply for asylum if you want to stay in the UK as a refugee.
To be eligible you must have left your country and be unable to go back because you fear persecution.
You should apply when you arrive in the UK or as soon as you think it would be unsafe for you to return to your own country. Your application is more likely to be denied if you wait.
When you apply you’ll have a meeting with an immigration officer (known as a ‘screening’).​

Therefore, by those criteria, all refugees crossing the channel. and hoping to be detected are using the only legal route.
Thus, the only illegal refugees are the ones who sneak into UK, and hope to avoid detection.

So can we now stop using the word 'illegal' to describe the refugees crossing the channel in dinghies, rubber/inflatable boats, etc?
They are the refugees using the only available legal route to seek asylum in UK.

​

I know it's difficult for you to read past the first line, so you've done well reading the entire first paragraph.
This breaks your record of 6 seconds attention span.
Well done.
Now, get someone with brain to read the second paragraph to you.
It says:

"Your claim might not be considered if you:

• are from an EU country
• travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’
• have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum"

See the line in bolt?
Also note the word "might".

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

It says:

"Your claim might not be considered if you:

• are from an EU country
• travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’
• have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum"

See the line in bolt?
Also note the word "might".

It's a nonsense comment because it says 'might'.
They could have easily said, your claim might not be considered if you are not a UK national.

 

[johnny2007]

It's a nonsense comment because it says 'might'.
They could have easily said, your claim might not be considered if you are not a UK national.

Ok, forget the might.
I know that's advanced English, so sorry for pointing it out to you.
What about the rest?
I write it again, ask someone to read it to you past the first line.

"Your claim might not be considered if you:

• are from an EU country
• travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’
• have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum"

Ask someone to read the bolt sentence to you.
It's hard work, I know, but try.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Ok, forget the might.
I know that's advanced English, so sorry for pointing it out to you.
What about the rest?
I write it again, ask someone to read it to you past the first line.

"Your claim might not be considered if you:

• are from an EU country
• travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’
• have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum"

Ask someone to read the bolt sentence to you.
It's hard work, I know, but try.

My response is exactly the same as the first time you posted your fatuous claim:

It's a nonsense comment because it says 'might'.
They could have easily said, your claim might not be considered if you are not a UK national.

 

[johnny2007]

My response is exactly the same as the first time you posted your fatuous claim:

I know, too difficult for you to read that.
Forget it.
I guess the only answer you like is "You're right bobby dazzler".
So here it is:
You're right bobby dazzler.
Now you can gorge on your drugs with a sense of achievement.
I hope this helps your 3 neurons.