The tragedy of antivaxxer obsessives

Sponsored Links
That's bound to happen to you as you are addicted to antivaxxer lies.
So she's my hero cos she lied in the eu parliament is that what you mean? I'm a bit confused.
You can chirp up again carman, always willing to feed you the lines.
 
Sponsored Links
You havin a laff you don't expect to be taken seriously with that horsesh*t

The laugh is certainly on you and those like you.

Why am I unsure of my views you silly sod, if anything I thank my lucky stars I didn't have the jab when I see how it's all unfolding.

How dare you! You are in a tiny minority, who believe the rubbish you read on social media about the bad effects, mostly which are rare and very minor. Worse yet, you try to spread your rubbish on here, trying to persuade others to join in with your total foolishness. Contrast that with the very real risk of your ending up seriously ill or dead - but then Darwin will have had his way.
 
That's bound to happen to you as you are addicted to antivaxxer lies.

Those of low intelligence levels are easily confused by the modern world and modern cures, plus of course statistics. They do tend to turn to people of similar levels of intelligence, on social media to tell them what they should believe - they big problem is that those on social media do often get it wrong, and some even have an axe to grind, or money to be made by serving up lies.

Ask them to qualify their lies, and all you get in return is bluster, or links to more lies, instead of genuine, hard facts which can be substantiated.
 
Your not going to believe this but you know that woman who said in the eu parliament that Pfizer hadn't tested for transmission, apparently it was broadcast on YouTube, well not anymore it's gone into room 101.
If you keep putting things in room 101 it doesn't make it easy getting ' facts' coordinated does it.

You seem rather easily taken in.

Pfizer weren’t required to test for reduced virus transmission during initial regulatory approval

Pfizer didn’t claim to

reduced virus transmission prior to rolling it out – which is something the companies were not required to do for initial regulatory approval, nor did they claim to have done



You have been taken in by a false argument.

Now that you have been shown to be spreading misinformation, I am sure you will be along to apologise for your error
 
Doesn't quite work like that though does it notch. Pfizer might have been up front at it's conception but it was kept under wraps by media outlets because the powers that be wanted to bring in virus passports. Bit of a hard sell if by having the jab you could still pass it on
Care staff workers lost their job if they weren't jabbed but those who were jabbed carried on even though they could still get covid and transmit covid.
I'm sure we'll get the usual yeah but yeah but what about what about and an old man with a brain as big as a planet will pigeon hole me again.
 
All about testing the water from time to time to see whether anybodies opinion has changed over time.
You say. And then go onto say
Doesn't quite work like that though does it notch. Pfizer might have been up front at it's conception but it was kept under wraps by media outlets because the powers that be wanted to bring in virus passports. Bit of a hard sell if by having the jab you could still pass it on
Care staff workers lost their job if they weren't jabbed but those who were jabbed carried on even though they could still get covid and transmit covid.
I'm sure we'll get the usual yeah but yeah but what about what about and an old man with a brain as big as a planet will pigeon hole me again.
Make your mind up if you can
 
Care staff workers lost their job if they weren't jabbed

Rather in the same way that a construction worker who refuses to wear a hard hat can be sacked. Even though fractured skulls are not contagious.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top