False Crime Report

The point is the PM is showing a near zero tolerance for people who f**k around with him.
But she told him about it before he appointed her to the shadow cabinet though, didn’t she - where was his zero tolerance then?
 
But she told him about it before he appointed her to the shadow cabinet though, didn’t she?
She disclosed a spent conditional discharge, but maybe not the whole story.
 
Maybe he was upset at her bashing her lawyer. He would know that a lawyer would never advise a guilty plea.

I’m now not sure if I believe she was even mugged.

I suspect that is why the police referred for prosecution, not making a “genuine mistake”.

Shame.. she’s a very brave lady…. With that hair.
 
Shame.. she’s a very brave lady…. With that hair.
..and those clothes. She should have been prosecuted by the fashion police.

1732867483751.jpeg
 
She disclosed a spent conditional discharge, but maybe not the whole story.
So she told him she pleaded guilty to a criminal offence yet he still appointed her. What’s changed since then?
 
The deputy political editor at the Mirror, interprets it this way: “Starmer’s reply essentially reads ‘sorry about all this, it’s exceptionally dumb, you’ll be back.’” Storm in a teacup, really, but mbk will doubtless fill the bilges with all kindsa b.s - man the pumps, it's gonna be a messy day.
 
Her statement reads:
As you know, in 2013 I was mugged in London. As a 24-year-old woman, the experience was terrifying. In the immediate aftermath, I reported the incident to the police. I gave the police a list of my possessions that I believed had been stolen, including my work phone. Some time later, I discovered that the handset in question was still in my house. I should have immediately informed my employer and not doing so straight away was a mistake.
 
Her statement reads:
As you know, in 2013 I was mugged in London. As a 24-year-old woman, the experience was terrifying. In the immediate aftermath, I reported the incident to the police. I gave the police a list of my possessions that I believed had been stolen, including my work phone. Some time later, I discovered that the handset in question was still in my house. I should have immediately informed my employer and not doing so straight away was a mistake.
People make mistakes, especially people who have been mugged. You think plod would pursue a s5 offence on the above?

For the offence to stick, she must have knowingly made a false statement to the police - i.e. told them lies.

As we know a guilty plea stops the facts coming out and we can make up a story that suits. Lawyers advise, they do not tell people who are innocent to plead guilty. That is career ending advice.
 
Last edited:
People make mistakes, especially people who have been mugged. You think plod would pursue a s5 offence on the above?

For the offence to stick, she must have knowingly made a false statement to the police - i.e. told them lies.

As we know a guilty plea stops the facts coming out and we can make up a story that suits. Lawyers advise, they do not tell people who are innocent to plead guilty. That is career ending advice.
people make mistakes all the time - since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven, and all you got left is speculation and conjecture - the perfect breeding ground for a 100 page merry-go-round. Enjoy.
 
people make mistakes all the time - since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven, and all you got left is speculation and conjecture - the perfect breeding ground for a 100 page merry-go-round. Enjoy.
I agree people make mistakes. "I thought they took my phone, turns out they didn't. I forgot to update you." That wouldn't result in being charged for the above s5 offence. She was convicted of making a false report. They had evidence of her deliberately lying, she pleaded guilty to making a false report - Lying to the police.

since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven
other than the fact she was charged, pleaded guilty and convicted, you mean :LOL:
 
Back
Top