D
Deleted member 317777
in your opinionBut you refuse to try to find it. Instead you declared Denso's data to be out of date without really knowing if it was or wasn't.![]()
in your opinionBut you refuse to try to find it. Instead you declared Denso's data to be out of date without really knowing if it was or wasn't.![]()
All you have to do is provided the evidence to back up where you “heard it”Wrong.
Ok then, just for you, seeing as it’s XmasYou need to prove it's a lie before declaring it to be so.
Otherwise it's just a difference of opinion.
Don’t conflate the issue because you’re wrong.You pointedly refuse to look for more up to date data.
That's not an opinion, it's fact.
The only way you can dispute Denso's data is to find more up to date data.
Nonsense.
He said he heard it.Did he say he had heard it?
If you disagree with his opinion, prove him wrong. Otherwise it's still a difference of opinion.
Where did he say that?
www.diynot.com
It’s up to 2021, you’re a bright chap, you know we are almost in 2025.Instead you declared Denso's data to be out of date without really knowing if it was or wasn't.
I was reminding JohnD he hasn’t provided me with the source.You're totally off your rocker.
JohnD was referring to the case of the young lad being incarcerated in Saudi Arabia for underage sex.
It was absolutely nothing to do with fillyboy's obsession with brown skinned people.
That comment has no relevance to the subsequent comments and your unfair accusation.
I have reached the conclusion that you trot out nonsense words which you hope will make sense.
But they invariably don't.
It’s the current version.Your comment was an off the cuff remark hoping to dispute the data.
It absolutely does mean it's the most up to date data available.
The only way you can prove it's out of date is by finding more up to date data, which you refuse to do.
In your opinion.You definitely were not reminding him that he hadn't provided you with the link you requested, other wise you would hav eposte din that thread.
You didn't, you intentionally cross-threaded the comments. Now you're trying to wriggle out of it, and cover your mistake.
It’s not up to date.You said it was out of date!
It's the most up to date data available, therefore it's the current version for reference, until it is superseded by more up to date data, which you refuse to provide.
So to all intents and purposes it is not out of date. It won't be out of date until it's superseded.
Go and watch some BBC News stuff, you might find the piece. I saw it this morning.That'll be a "no" then?
I did suspect it had been photoshopped, and not very well.
He’s just a poor man’s TrollGo and watch some BBC News stuff, you might find the piece. I saw it this morning.
If you think I'm going to waste my time finding a link to the piece to placate you, you've got a long wait
This is a GD section on a DIY forum, not a uni course or formal debating society.
Nonsense.