Explain then, if you can?Nope.

Explain then, if you can?Nope.

Making no point about anything thenI didn't think this was what Nosey was arguing at all.
Rather pointing out that (of a total no. of cases), the vast majority were attributable to white males.
Irrelevant waffle. RightoIrrelevant waffle.
Can you explain this please....
..and how it fits with your other lies?

How can you rely on the data if it is literally saying a large amount of crimes are not reported when against ethnic minorities.Explain then, if you can?
Correct. The table, whilst interesting changes nothing in this regard...Irrelevant waffle.

Lol. A large amount of crime goes unreported regards white offenders also.. Irrelevant to the facts that are reported i.e.....How can you rely on the data if it is literally saying a large amount of crimes are not reported when against ethnic minorities.

But that’s not what the report says or the data.Lol. A large amount of crime goes unreported regards white offenders also.. Irrelevant to the facts that are reported i.e.....
Most grooming gang offences carried out by white men, police chiefs say
How can the victim demographic explain or show or have any relation to the offender demographic? I'm baffled as to why you think this section shows anything other than the victim make up???Answered.
What data? You have posted up nothing which disputes what I have posted.But that’s not what the report says or the data.

Why do you think some are desperate to deflect from that fact?Most grooming gang offences carried out by white men, police chiefs say
Research has found that group-based CSE offenders are most commonly White.
I proved him wrong in the other thread and he did not like it. I also think the bloke is not right in the head. He's confused or summat.Why do you think some are desperate to deflect from that fact?
No, it really doesn't.It’s saying it’s really hard to make a link to ethnicity. This drives a hole though your it’s a white british male problem argument.
I have read it.Didn’t read section 3.3.3. Obviously.
3.3.3 Ethnicity Children on child protection plans under the primary category of sexual abuse on 31 March 2023 were more likely to be from White (White British or ‘White other’) backgrounds than the population of children attending English state schools and nurseries, or than the children placed on child protection plans for other reasons (see Figure 7). While 13% of children attending state schools and nurseries were from Asian backgrounds, only 8% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse were Asian; similarly, Black children made up 6% of the state school and nursery population but 3% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse. Research has highlighted the difficulties that professionals face in identifying sexual abuse and acting on concerns about children from minority ethnic backgrounds (Ali et al, 2021; Rodger et al, 2020), while also concluding that the likelihood of being sexually abused does not vary significantly between ethnic groups (Bebbington et al, 2011). Figure 6. Children on child protection plans and children in need at 31 March 2022, by sex, EnglandWhat do you think the last paragraph says?
What’s the ratio of white men v anyone else in the uk, that shows a completely different picture!Why do you think some are desperate to deflect from that fact?

No need to guess, the facts have been posted.Can you guess what it is?