• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Another thread arguing about the value of vaccines (Ed.)

Lirefighter said:
You wait.
In 3, 5, or 10 years time the terrible side effects may manifest. They might not, but as you said, you can't not have it now.
It's too late.
Click to expand...
Fun fact, that's never been a problem for any vaccine ever. Any long term repercussions have been present or detectable within 6 months of the vaccine, typically in just weeks.

It has taken time to identify adverse effects, but the COVID vaccines have been studied more than any others have ever. Wed have spotted issues by now.
 
IT Minion said:
It depends what you mean by judge. I mean that I form an opinion about you, positive or negative.

You have the right to choose your own fate, but nothing says that when you tell other people that we have to pretend it was a wise choice when it's almost certainly down to ignorance.

So yes, I can and will judge you. Others may have a higher tolerance for idiocy and find it less irritating.
Click to expand...

Thing is, i have never told anyone that they should or should have a jab. Never. So, your accusal is just lies.

Idiotic is how i would describe your post.
 
IT Minion said:
You have the right to choose your own fate, but nothing says that when you tell other people that we have to pretend it was a wise choice when it's almost certainly down to ignorance.
Click to expand...
You would of thought that trained professional nurses were not ignorant and yet 80,000 of them were 1 week away from being sacked for not taking the vax.
www.bbc.co.uk

Covid vaccines: The unvaccinated NHS workers facing the sack

NHS staff explain why they have chosen not to have a Covid vaccine as the mandatory deadline looms.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Lirefighter said:
You wait.
In 3, 5, or 10 years time the terrible side effects may manifest. They might not, but as you said, you can't not have it now.
It's too late.
Click to expand...
But some said the vaccine was intended to reduce the earths population by 6 billion, that was the plan all along. But not just yet, some time in the future? Ok...
 
aveatry said:
You would of thought that trained professional nurses were not ignorant and yet 80,000 of them were 1 week away from being sacked for not taking the vax.
www.bbc.co.uk

Covid vaccines: The unvaccinated NHS workers facing the sack

NHS staff explain why they have chosen not to have a Covid vaccine as the mandatory deadline looms.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
80,000 NHS employees out of 1,500,000. That's 5%. That seems about right.

Yet another demonstration of how some people don't question or think about statistics.
 
denso13 said:
Over 90% had it, were they the ignorant ones?
Click to expand...
The 90% figure includes EMPLOYEES not just nurses and those who had only part 1 of the two part. I know from someone very close to me that many nurses who reluctantly had the first one did not go ahead and have the second one as soon as the threat of job loss was lifted. 90% is not the real figure.
 
denso13 said:
Over 90% had it, were they the ignorant ones?
Click to expand...
That’s not what he said or meant.

Shame on you
IT Minion said:
80,000 NHS employees out of 1,500,000. That's 5%. That seems about right.

Yet another demonstration of how some people don't question or think about statistics.
Click to expand...
It paints a very different picture when the percentage is made up from NHS staff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
One wonders why...
2
Replies
15
Views
2K
durhamplumber
D
Back
Top