you really are strugglin with your lies today. why lie about what your worth is it small penis syndrome ?oh dear, I’m living rent free in gases head
Poor gas can’t work out that I move money around……that’s the benefit of premium bonds, it’s as easy as taking money in and out of a bank account.
Poor old gas gettin his knickers in a twist……probably because Trump is failing BADLY
- Joined
- 28 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 8,359
- Reaction score
- 963
- Country
One of this months million winners had a holding of £100
D
Deleted member 317777
so this months winnings you claim .......The ones in my wife’s name got £75 this month, in my name a measly £25oh dear, I’m living rent free in gases head
Poor gas can’t work out that I move money around……that’s the benefit of premium bonds, it’s as easy as taking money in and out of a bank account.
Poor old gas gettin his knickers in a twist……probably because Trump is failing BADLY
Was that on full allowance of 50k each ?
It was the sentencing council not Labour
Labour Party say they want it reversed
Nwgs2 has posted a simple lie
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,847
- Reaction score
- 5,364
- Country
Robert Jenrick says new sentencing guidelines have 'blatant bias against Christians and straight white men'
The chair of the body behind the sentencing reforms has defended the changes by saying a punishment tailored to individual offenders had the "greatest likelihood" of being effective.
It’s woke culture either way and it damages the concept of blind justice.
Yeah, yeah. You never see the alerts when somebody quotes or tags you either do you? Convenient.
That stage of justice has never been blind. Faux outrage is boring.Robert Jenrick says new sentencing guidelines have 'blatant bias against Christians and straight white men'
The chair of the body behind the sentencing reforms has defended the changes by saying a punishment tailored to individual offenders had the "greatest likelihood" of being effective.news.sky.com
It’s woke culture either way and it damages the concept of blind justice.
It might be better to say that the sentencing stage of a trial is not meant to be blind. The courts are supposed to take a fully informed view of the offender to select the right punishment.
I would be interested in the rationale, though, for putting ethnic minorities on that list.
With some of the other groups it seems obvious why they are there e.g. young people and disabled people.
I'm not sure why females are on the list?
With some of the other groups it seems obvious why they are there e.g. young people and disabled people.
I'm not sure why females are on the list?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,847
- Reaction score
- 5,364
- Country
What? you think race, religion, wealth etc are relevant factors for sentencing?
Sentences should be based on circumstances of the offender and the crime committed. One group should not be excluded from a more detailed assessment than another.
Now that's a more interesting point of view. I don't know why those criteria have been chosen to get a pre sentencing report. Or in other words why those criteria are now enough to pay attention to when examining the circumstances of the offender.
Has anyone read the minutes or looked for the justification?
I believe it is well accepted that certain groups have always had an easier ride during sentencing.
That would come out in the plea in mitigation or the car itself, plenty of options. Crime gets worse with the economy, look at America. Sentencing guidelines won’t make a jot of difference to overall crime, but Jenny can’t resist diverting attention from ukrane by stirring his favourite pot
