- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,229
- Reaction score
- 7,782
- Country

Absolutely they would. I am like a diet coke advert to them now even in my PPEI thought you said streaking there.
The naked highway man
The bored and lonely housewives would love it.

Absolutely they would. I am like a diet coke advert to them now even in my PPEI thought you said streaking there.
The naked highway man
The bored and lonely housewives would love it.

Have you not learned it's impolite and unacceptable to alter quotes?
Otherwise I could easily do this:
But I wouldn't because it's juvenile and undignified, and inicates a distinct lack of intelligent ability.
even in my PPE

Doubt itAbsolutely they would. I am like a diet coke advert to them now even in my PPE


yes that is when I was at my heaviest. As you say I have lost 3lbs since this was taken. You can see the attraction that I get.View attachment 381468I know this is an old pic and you've lost a pound or two since it was taken, but it's the only one I've got.
You get the gist.![]()

All the time, we are on motorways, major fast roads etc. Dangerous work so the PPE is mandatory.Do you have to wear PPE?

An intention to claim asylum, while in French waters.If the origin of those rescued is indertimate, there is a potential for being accused of people trafficking.
Also, if the rescue occurs at the edge of the territorial waters, why would British boats choose to go further afield to land their survivors, when they are familiar with their home waters. Much of France's coast is considered dangerous waters.
There is no obligation on landing survivors at the nearest point of safety.
You can't literally "push other boats". So if they refused and continued on their course, you cannot endanger their survival.
Article 25 says:
An intention to apply for asylum can hardly be described as "not innocent."
And you cannot endanger their survival on that basis.

It may be. Can you provide stats to support your assertion.
If you are right it indicates the failure of succesive governments' policies.
But it's still only about 10% of the total immigration.
A much larger group of immigrants are the dependents of the primary immigrant. But to make it more difficult for the dependents to accompany the primary immigrant will discourage the number of primary immigrants. That would seriously affect the potential of UK.
It's like complaining about the few millionaires choosing to leave UK and claiming that it leaves UK impoverished, when the vast majority choose to stay.
All the time, we are on motorways, major fast roads etc. Dangerous work so the PPE is mandatory.
no it isntIlegal immigration is at a record high.
there were no deterrents in place that could be scrappedScrapping the deterrents

What a ridiculous statistic. You want to compare a full year to partial yearno it isnt
currently small boat arrivals are 650 per week
in 2022 small boat arrivals were 900 per week
They had a working deterrent, people were leaving and going to other countries.the numbers arriving by small boat is influenced by a number of factors, almost none of them to do with British govt policy, Rwanda for example had no deterrent effect..........which is why Sunak quietly dropped his "stop the boats" slogan and pledge

thats hilarious.You've got love Hopkins