• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Yes, it IS rocket science !

Joined
20 Jul 2010
Messages
396
Reaction score
166
Location
Renfrewshire
Country
United Kingdom
Watched the news a couple of days ago, with great interest in the SpaceX rocket launch/programme.......
So how does the biggest, heaviest rocket ever made, after being launched and flying halfway around the world, manage to ' gently land', arse end first into the ocean ? I mean, this thing is 400 ft long, falling to earth at god knows how many hundred miles an hour, presumably head first, but somehow can stop and do a 180, then ever so gently and controlled ' land' in reverse ?I
I don't get it, but it's pretty awesome
 
Im better at brain surgery than rocket science, hence my question...

We got to the moon in the 60s, so why do they struggle so much now?
 
There are a few programs about space x testing the reusable rockets complete with some very high profile accidents
 
Watched the news a couple of days ago, with great interest in the SpaceX rocket launch/programme.......
So how does the biggest, heaviest rocket ever made, after being launched and flying halfway around the world, manage to ' gently land', arse end first into the ocean ? I mean, this thing is 400 ft long, falling to earth at god knows how many hundred miles an hour, presumably head first, but somehow can stop and do a 180, then ever so gently and controlled ' land' in reverse ?I
I don't get it, but it's pretty awesome
Corgis worked on the landing tech of course!!!

Pffffttt!!!
 
Im better at brain surgery than rocket science, hence my question...

We got to the moon in the 60s, so why do they struggle so much now?

"Struggle" insofar as the available money is very limited, compared to the Apollo times.
Apollo took almost 1% of US GDP.
NASA now takes less than 0.1% of US GDP. And that's for everything.

Plus, they're less arrised than when they were obsessing over beating the Russians there.
 
"Struggle" insofar as the available money is very limited, compared to the Apollo times.
Apollo took almost 1% of US GDP.
NASA now takes less than 0.1% of US GDP. And that's for everything.

Plus, they're less arrised than when they were obsessing over beating the Russians there.
That makes sense, I knew that :mrgreen:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top