- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,845
- Reaction score
- 3,514
- Country

Let's deal with facts, shall we?So Ang can do no wrong in your eyes?


Let's deal with facts, shall we?So Ang can do no wrong in your eyes?
Let's deal with facts, shall we?
No, I’m not a fan at all.So Ang can do no wrong in your eyes?
The title of this thread is false.So what are the facts?
The land registry took its time, so what, she still took her name off the deeds. Sounds like a journo was over zealous for a story but didn’t understand the factsAt least one news article is saying the deeds and council tax records don’t align with her story. Rayner because “she has told Tameside council in Greater Manchester that her constituency home in Ashton-under-Lyme is her primary residence and informed Brighton and Hove council that her Hove apartment is a second home for council tax purposes.”
Having been through this process myself. I paid second property tax, which would have been eligible for refund within the time limits. I think it may turn out that she should have too and then claimed it back once the deeds were changed.
It actually takes months for the land register to process these changes. Sometimes more than a year.

Is she out of jail yet, from her last episode of tax dodging?Motorbiking could find himself in trouble for defamation.
The title of this thread is false.

So, is she a tax dodger again?But you can’t say that because the actual facts aren’t in the public domain
So, is she a tax dodger again?

So people can say the thread title is false then. Nobody knows.I’ve no idea so I’m sitting on the fence.
So people can say the thread title is false then. Nobody knows.

Quite.But nobody knows, so nobody can defend it or accuse her so the title really needs to include the word alledgely
Quite.
At the end of the day there are very few members of the HoC who are honest