
When was that. In the interview yesterday she said I sold my 25% stakeHis trust owns at least 50% now. AR has sold her half to the trust and no longer has any legal ownership. I don't know about her ex.

Possibly.As for where she has bought could she not have moved a bit further away from her disabled son
His parents put 50% of the house in the trust a while ago (don't know if money was involved) she sold her remaining 25% and ex husband still owns 25%.When was that. In the interview yesterday she said I sold my 25% stake
His parents put 50% of the house in the trust a while ago (don't know if money was involved) she sold her remaining 25% and ex husband still owns 25%.
I see so the lad has 75% of the house in a trust.His parents put 50% of the house in the trust a while ago (don't know if money was involved) she sold her remaining 25% and ex husband still owns 25%.
I see so the lad has 75% of the house in a trust.
Do we know how much the house is worth and how much the pay out for him was and also what was the payout for, he was a very premature baby - did the hospital do something wrong afterwards. And why did Rayner fight to keep all that away from the public.
The house is worth 675 000 and to be fair the rest is none of our business.I see so the lad has 75% of the house in a trust.
Do we know how much the house is worth and how much the pay out for him was and also what was the payout for, he was a very premature baby - did the hospital do something wrong afterwards. And why did Rayner fight to keep all that away from the public.


Her son's business should be private, she is fair game.It is when it's the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Deputy Prime Minister
No it's not, her children should be protected.It is when it's the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Deputy Prime Minister
Why should it be.The house is worth 675 000 and to be fair the rest is none of our business.
