National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

[pete01]

Damn it scrub post 1021 I wasn't replying to him again again and im not now...see ya

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Don't wait I wont be able to squeeze a drop

Too mnay been taking the pee out of you?

 

[Leftum]

I suspect your previous username was not a name to be honoured.
Your current incarnation is obviously a cowardly troll who tries to destroy an ex-poster's reputation when they're not here to respond.

I don’t have a previous account—well unless you want to call me Jon—

 

[pete01]

 

[mitch66]

You think it's OK to try to destroy a previous user's reputation when they're not here to respond?
What kind of disgusting person are you?

They were mental. Trolled like mad, had a melt down and left. Came back, new name etc etc. Troll, leave, return, repeat. Funny as fuk.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

They were mental. Trolled like mad, had a melt down and left. Came back, new name etc etc. Troll, leave, return, repeat. Funny as fuk.

Another troll with a damaged reputation just woken up.
Tom must have embarrassed many trolls.

 

[aveatry]

Too much protesting me thinks.

Yes there is a lot of dothing going on

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Yes there is a lot of dothing going on

I asked before, but you never answered. What does "dothing" mean?
Could it be you read 'clothing' as 'dothing' somewhere?

 

[morqthana]

On another note five of the survivors panel have said they will only continue if Jess Philips retains her role.

Search for new grooming inquiry head will 'take months'

The process to chose a chair for the inquiry was thrown into chaos when two leading the leading recused themselves from the job, the BBC understands.

www.bbc.co.uk

Also i thought there were 20 on the survivors panel, but it was originally 30, so 26 remain.

i also was under the impression that the four resignations wanted the enquiry to be focussed entirely on grooming gangs.

So we have some of the witnesses saying they won't participate unless Jess Phillips is sacked, and some saying they won't participate if she is.

And we have people here focussing entirely on the first group, and ignoring the latter. Political bias?

We have some of the witnesses saying that the scope of the enquiry should be only Asian grooming gangs, and some saying it should be wider.

And we have people here focussing entirely on the first group, and ignoring the latter, and indeed foully abusing anybody who agrees with that group. Racial bias?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

So we have some of the witnesses saying they won't participate unless Jess Phillips is sacked, and some saying they won't participate if she is.

And we have people here focussing entirely on the first group, and ignoring the latter. Political bias?

We have some of the witnesses saying that the scope of the enquiry should be only Asian grooming gangs, and some saying it should be wider.

And we have people here focussing entirely on the first group, and ignoring the latter, and indeed foully abusing anybody who agrees with that group. Racial bias?

I suspect that Jim Gamble was accurate in his reason for withdrawing from the nomination of chair of the enquiry. The political footballers are damaging the prospects of the enquiry.
It's a shame he withdrew because I think he would have made an excellent chair.

The reason given by the resigning four, about not been allowed to discuss the enquiry with friends and family suggests to me that there were external actors trying to interfere, as Jim Gamble intimated.

 

[fillyboy]

Leftum has presented some posts by Mottie, fillystine and Pete which supposedly quote Toms' posts. Those poster have a history of dishonesty and have several axes to grind with me, probably with Tom before me. So alteration of Tom's posts by those posters is very probable.
There's no way of knowing if they have altered those posts of Tom or not.
How does that "bust" me?

You really are a nutjob.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

You really are a nutjob.

In your undistinguished and disreputable opinion.
Is this more of your disinformation?

 

[aveatry]

I asked before, but you never answered. What does "dothing" mean?
Could it be you read 'clothing' as 'dothing' somewhere?

You have so many post going with at least 2 usernames that you can not keep track can you.
You keep protesting too much, doth protest too much. So you keep protesting too much there for you are dothing

 

[fillyboy]

In your undistinguished and disreputable opinion.
Is this more of your disinformation?

The quickening.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

You have so many post going with at least 2 usernames that you can not keep track can you.
You keep protesting too much, doth protest too much. So you keep protesting too much there for you are dothing

There's no such word as dothing.
Only two other usernames, you can't keep up can you.