Israel accepts the numbers are correct...

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Middle East has been like this throughout history.

As has Europe.

Most of Europe has enough racist and xenophobic hate to keep the pot boiling, but recognises that racism, apartheid and genocide have no place in a peaceful and civilised society. Israel's policies are the opposite.
 
Most of Europe has enough racist and xenophobic hate to keep the pot boiling, but recognises that racism, apartheid and genocide have no place in a peaceful and civilised society.

Yes, that's why they proscribed the IRGC and Hamas as terror groups.

But, interestingly, not Israel.

Why's that John.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Yes, that's why they proscribed the IRGC and Hamas as terror groups.

But, interestingly, not Israel.

Why's that John.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

1770419618829.jpeg


1770419988356.png
 
What a load of codswallop

I don't think I've ever seen the word 'allegedly' used so many time in one document. It'll be worth breaking open a bag of popcorn if it goes to trial in a few years.
From memory I think April this year is when written submissions are due. Should be a laugh.
 
I don't think I've ever seen the word 'allegedly' used so many time in one document. It'll be worth breaking open a bag of popcorn if it goes to trial in a few years.
From memory I think April this year is when written submissions are due. Should be a laugh.
It will go nowhere fast. Unless they can get a few together to arrest such as Putin, Kim jong Un and Ayatollah Khamenei in one swoop,
 
I don't think I've ever seen the word 'allegedly' used so many time in one document.

Once in the Netenyahu warrant.

Twice in Gallant's.

And you've never seen that many before? In the case of Netenyahu's warrant that would mean, if you are being truthful, that you've never seen that word used at all, ever, anywhere, in any document whatsoever.

Really?

Frankly I'm amazed you know the meaning of a word you've never seen.

And what word should prosecutors use in warrants, or charge sheets, etc, before a defendant has had a trial, and before a court has decided whether they are guilty of the offences alleged?
 
Once in the Netenyahu warrant.

Twice in Gallant's.

And you've never seen that many before? In the case of Netenyahu's warrant that would mean, if you are being truthful, that you've never seen that word used at all, ever, anywhere, in any document whatsoever.

Really?

Frankly I'm amazed you know the meaning of a word you've never seen.

And what word should prosecutors use in warrants, or charge sheets, etc, before a defendant has had a trial, and before a court has decided whether they are guilty of the offences alleged?

Don't be ridiculous, of course I've seen the word before, just not as often as that in one document.

The fact is, you are rather sneakily presenting that document as evidence that Netanyahu, Israel or others are guilty of war crimes. Wrong. A few African countries (surprise surprise) have lodged a complaint and it's being followed up.

Ain't going to be no trial, ain't going to be no conviction, nothing to see here.
 
Don't be ridiculous, of course I've seen the word before, just not as often as that in one document.

How can you have seen it before and also not have seen it used as often as once?

Not as often as once means zero. Never.
 
The fact is, you are rather sneakily presenting that document as evidence that Netanyahu, Israel or others are guilty of war crimes.

No, I'm not. I believe he is, and the document is evidence that I'm not alone in that belief, but it's not evidence of guilt, that's why we have courts, and trials.

I presented the arrest warrants in response to you setting store by the fact that with other people somebody has said "these are bad men", but those people did not include your beloved Israel.

Just pointing out that some people think that the leader(s) of Israel are also bad men.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thread locked. Too many ad-hom posts
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top