- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,664
- Reaction score
- 6,186
- Country

receiver pays the costs less the transfer costs. that is why.I agree. It just isn't proving possible at the moment and it is unclear what the bottle neck is.

receiver pays the costs less the transfer costs. that is why.I agree. It just isn't proving possible at the moment and it is unclear what the bottle neck is.
Not if you want to reform criminals. Housing then away from friends and family is correlated with worse reoffending stats.The idea of using overseas prisons at a fraction of the cost is a good one.

If you look at the details of their policy - they are only considering a certain category of long term prisoners. Additionally f2f visitation is very low among these offenders.Not if you want to reform criminals. Housing then away from friends and family is correlated with worse reoffending stats.
I don't care in the slightest what they do or don't do just as long as they're not in the UK.Not if you want to reform criminals. Housing then away from friends and family is correlated with worse reoffending stats.
From memory they are indeed much worse for private prisons. They've got a negative incentive to reform prisoners and they're the lowest bidder so cut where they can.But if you're talking about shipping out UK-based prisoners then we do have a long-term interest. But sadly our prisons are doing next to nothing to rehabilitate anyway, so any outsourced prisons would need to be really terrible to be worse.

slight cross conversation here. There are two policies being discussed.I don't care in the slightest what they do or don't do just as long as they're not in the UK.
If the government of their country of origin doesn't care about the welfare of their people by releasing them or whatever then that is not our concern.
But if you're talking about shipping out UK-based prisoners then we do have a long-term interest. But sadly our prisons are doing next to nothing to rehabilitate anyway, so any outsourced prisons would need to be really terrible to be worse.
Do you have a link to hand? I've found them quoting 10,000 which is 1 in 8If you look at the details of their policy - they are only considering a certain category of long term prisoners. Additionally f2f visitation is very low among these offenders.

Do you have a link to hand? I've found them quoting 10,000 which is 1 in 8
It has to be a significant consideration. The bigger the burden of the state on the tax payer, the more jobs go overseas and the poorer we get as a nation. It's almost that simple.Everything comes down to money with you.
12,400 New Prison Places on MoD Land in Under 18 Months. We will end the prison place shortage. During the covid crisis, NHS Nightingale hospitals were built in weeks with help from the British Armed Forces. We would build 5 new Nightingale Prisons with the assistance of the Army. These would be low cost, high security, pre-fabricated modular structures...
or you could read it:All their policy says is that they will build 30,000 new prison places.
Which groups do you think they will let out.
That doesn't reference the overseas prisoners category though, unless I'm still missing it. Are we talking people in remand for five years or more? 10, 20?It has to be a significant consideration. The bigger the burden of the state on the tax payer, the more jobs go overseas and the poorer we get as a nation. It's almost that simple.Everything comes down to money with you.
12,400 New Prison Places on MoD Land in Under 18 Months. We will end the prison place shortage. During the covid crisis, NHS Nightingale hospitals were built in weeks with help from the British Armed Forces. We would build 5 new Nightingale Prisons with the assistance of the Army. These would be low cost, high security, pre-fabricated modular structures...

Its light on detail but this is what they are saying :That doesn't reference the overseas prisoners category though, unless I'm still missing it. Are we talking people in remand for five years or more? 10, 20?
But your reference to the army doing the work: generally they're not allowed to do that stuff by law iirc. National emergencies are an exception but this doesn't really count.
Also the overseas deals are unlikely to be 'agile', the only other examples have been fixed cost multi year contracts that need full utilisation to meet cost requirements.
10,000 + Additional “Dynamic Prison” Places Overseas. Serious offenders will serve their time overseas. We will acquire flexible, low cost prison capacity through rented prison cells in third party countries. We would consider multiple partners including El Salvador.
10k is roughly the same number as the number of people sentenced for 10 years or more, (including IPP which is a stain on British justice).Its light on detail but this is what they are saying :

I think it has potential.10k is roughly the same number as the number of people sentenced for 10 years or more, (including IPP which is a stain on British justice).
My guess is that's who they're targeting.
There will be no UK prisoners shipped abroad. It's pie-in-the-sky nonsense, designed to provoke the gormless into breathing out.