Correct.Squirrels?
![]()
Trump tantrums to follow.
Correct.Squirrels?
![]()



seems we are getting closer.

That is what they are relying on. But even their own AI can see through it.That's why I am supporting Anthropic.
The other issue, for those interested in the big picture, is that this is just another example of the slide into autocracy:
Trump sanctions lawyers who represent people challenging his policies.
Trump threatens to cancel the broadcast licences of TV networks unless they ditch shows critical of him.
Trump prosecutes opposition politicians for criticising his policies.
And as in this case, Trump attempts to destroy private companies who refuse to go along with his policies.
See through what? There's no financial benefit to this choice for Anthropic. They might not stick to it and they might suffer significantly but what is there to 'see through'?That is what they are relying on. But even their own AI can see through it.

See through what? There's no financial benefit to this choice for Anthropic. They might not stick to it and they might suffer significantly but what is there to 'see through'?

'Mr. Michael, who was on a call with Anthropic executives at the time, said the Pentagon wanted the company to allow for the collection and analysis of unclassified, commercial bulk data on Americans, such as geolocation and web browsing data, people briefed on the negotiations said.
Anthropic told the Pentagon that it was willing to let its technology be used by the National Security Agency for classified material collected under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. But the company wanted a legally binding promise from the Pentagon not to use its technology on unclassified commercial data.'
On Saturday, Mr. Altman invited people to ask him questions on X about the deal as OpenAI faced a backlash for swooping in. Many questioned how OpenAI could sign a deal with the Pentagon and still uphold its safety principles, as well as whether OpenAI’s agreement truly protected its A.I. models from misuse.
