Starmer's treachery

[James Carmichael]

I have no idea why Starmer is refusing to support our ally, Donald Trump, in his actions in Iran. I can only assume that if you follow the money to whoever is pulling the strings of his (probably illegal) occupation of Downing Street you'll get your answer.

However, what is true is that his decisions will inevitably provoke sanctions from Donald, foreseeably so.

There is a word for someone who deliberately acts or lobbies to provoke a foreign power to attack their own country: Traitor.

Today's PMQs is going to be epic. I cannot wait for Nigel's scolding of the traitor. Cannot wait.

 

[fillyboy]

Lord Hermer's fingerprints will be all over it.

 

[MNW67]

What a load of silly nonsense.

Iran was no danger to us.

 

[James Carmichael]

What a load of silly nonsense.

Iran was no danger to us.

No, but Starmer's treachery is.

 

[James Carmichael]

Lord Hermer's fingerprints will be all over it.

I am going to respectfully decline to get involved in conspiracy theories.

 

[motorbiking]

It’s right that Starmer hasn’t joined in. He doesn’t have the leadership skills. Best we stay out of it.

 

[James Carmichael]

It’s right that Starmer hasn’t joined in. He doesn’t have the leadership skills. Best we stay out of it.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man. The right answer would have been for Starmer to say "I don't have the leadership skills in this hour of international crisis, I will stand aside".

A government of national unity, the people's choice, under Reform would then lead us - and rightfully so.

 

[MNW67]

Cometh the hour, cometh the man. The rigth answer would have been for Starmer to say "I don't have the leadership skills, I will stand aside".

A government of national unity, the people's choice, under Reform would then lead us - and rightfully so.

I gave you a Thanks because you made me laugh.

 

[James Carmichael]

I gave you a Thanks because you made me laugh.

I appreciated it.

I have thanked you back as you show us all that our work to cleanse this country is not yet done.

 

[Vinty]

I have no idea why Starmer is refusing to support our ally, Donald Trump, in his actions in Iran. I can only assume that if you follow the money to whoever is pulling the strings of his (probably illegal) occupation of Downing Street you'll get your answer.

However, what is true is that his decisions will inevitably provoke sanctions from Donald, foreseeably so.

There is a word for someone who deliberately acts or lobbies to provoke a foreign power to attack their own country: Traitor.

Today's PMQs is going to be epic. I cannot wait for Nigel's scolding of the traitor. Cannot wait.

Harold Wilson didn't join the Americans in Vietnam.
Was Harold Wilson a traitor.

 

[Lower]

What a load of silly nonsense.

Iran was no danger to us.

Iran is/was a danger to the whole world. They sponsored terrorism left, right and centre. If they achieved their goal of making a nuclear weapon, it would be a huge direct and indirect threat to us.

Starmer is a spineless lawyer who's only principle is doing whatever he thinks he needs to do to stay in power. He can't/won't make a decision unless its backed up by a cast iron legal guarantee and he is assured he's got the support of his MPs. That is not a leader.

I don't have any affection for Trump, but Starmer has made about the worst decision he could. By not providing support to the US he has p!ssed off our biggest ally. Not only that, sitting on the fence didn't stop Iran attacking RAF Akrotiri and he's had to u-turn. So he's ended up having support the US anyway but has managed to royally p!ss them off in the process. The worst of both worlds.

 

[James Carmichael]

Iran is/was a danger to the whole world. They sponsored terrorism left, right and centre. If they achieved their goal of making a nuclear weapon, it would be a huge direct and indirect threat to us.

Starmer is a spineless lawyer who's only principle is doing whatever he thinks he needs to do to stay in power. He can't/won't make a decision unless its backed up by a cast iron legal guarantee and he is assured he's got the support of his MPs. That is not a leader.

I don't have any affection for Trump, but Starmer has made about the worst decision he could. By not providing support to the US he has p!ssed off our biggest ally. Not only that, sitting on the fence didn't stop Iran attacking RAF Akrotiri and he's had to u-turn. So he's ended up having support the US anyway but has managed to royally p!ss them off in the process. The worst of both worlds.

Excellent summary.

 

[MNW67]

Iran is/was a danger to the whole world. They sponsored terrorism left, right and centre. If they achieved their goal of making a nuclear weapon, it would be a huge direct and indirect threat to us.

There was no risk of Iran getting a nuclear weapon. You have fallen for Trump's lies. I bet you supported the Iraq War.

The rest of your post is nonsense.

 

[Deluks]

I am going to respectfully decline to get involved in conspiracy theories.

You already have.

 

[Lower]

There was no risk of Iran getting a nuclear weapon. You have fallen for Trump's lies. I bet you supported the Iraq War.

The rest of your post is nonsense.

Which bit of my post is nonsense?

Did Starmer **** of the Americans by not allowing them to use our bases?
Yes
Did Iran attack RAF Akrotiri?
Yes
Has Starmer ended up allowing the Americans to use our bases anyway?
Yes

I'd say i was pretty factually accurate.