Us. ?
“Christ is king”
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
Does it now?
Post up any hostility towards anyone Jewish i've made...
...i won't wait since you still haven't shown any examples of me making any denial of the Holocaust.
Nothing constructive to add, again, i see.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 85
- Country
The forum. This is not a private conversation between just you and I.
This isn’t a conversation
Yes it does.
I can’t post from deleted threads.
That was deleted too. Just like this thread will be,
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 85
- Country
At least HWM admitted he didn't read it, he just ignored it because Odds ahad posted it
.
It's an open forum, and if you're going to report anyything that you might find offensive, and report it, the forum deserves to know.
.
FFS that is what I said.
It's an open forum, and if you're going to report anyything that you might find offensive, and report it, the forum deserves to know.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,853
- Reaction score
- 6,273
- Country
Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?
This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.
This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.
Done…Again.
But why is it being reported.
Isn't it just flagging up an interesting development on the Christian far right in the USA.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,853
- Reaction score
- 6,273
- Country
No and no
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 85
- Country
To sum up, Odds posted some excerpts from an article.
You found it offensive and reported it.
But you can't or won't tell the forum what it was you found offensive, and you refuse to tell us if you explained to the mods why you found it offensive. At the same time you insist that you had read it.
I suspect it was because you thought it was anti-Semitic. You've previously claimed that you'd reported earlier posts because you thought they were anti-Semitic.
You were asked which posts these were that you found anti-Semitic, but you said you couldn't post them as proof of what you say, because they'd been deleted.
So I asked you to post anything from the article that Odds posted, that you thought was anti-Semitic as proof that some of us were posting anti-Semitic comments.
You posted an extract from somewhere, (which wasn't actually anti-Semitic). I asked you if it was a passage from the article presented by Odds, and could you indicate exactly where you copied it from, or post up the source of it, if it wasn't from Odd's article.
You didn't have the courtesy to respond to either of my requests.
So now you had the perfect opportunity to prove that some anti-Semitic posts were posted by some posters, you've declined that opportunity, and splurted your usual rubbish about deleted posts.
Odd's post remains, and you think it's anti-Semitic, so please post an extract from that article to prove that anti-Semitic comments are posted.
I think that you're an exploitative blaguard, exploiting the fact that Mods admit that they are too busy to verify reports, and just delete them.
You found it offensive and reported it.
But you can't or won't tell the forum what it was you found offensive, and you refuse to tell us if you explained to the mods why you found it offensive. At the same time you insist that you had read it.
I suspect it was because you thought it was anti-Semitic. You've previously claimed that you'd reported earlier posts because you thought they were anti-Semitic.
You were asked which posts these were that you found anti-Semitic, but you said you couldn't post them as proof of what you say, because they'd been deleted.
So I asked you to post anything from the article that Odds posted, that you thought was anti-Semitic as proof that some of us were posting anti-Semitic comments.
You posted an extract from somewhere, (which wasn't actually anti-Semitic). I asked you if it was a passage from the article presented by Odds, and could you indicate exactly where you copied it from, or post up the source of it, if it wasn't from Odd's article.
You didn't have the courtesy to respond to either of my requests.
So now you had the perfect opportunity to prove that some anti-Semitic posts were posted by some posters, you've declined that opportunity, and splurted your usual rubbish about deleted posts.
Odd's post remains, and you think it's anti-Semitic, so please post an extract from that article to prove that anti-Semitic comments are posted.
I think that you're an exploitative blaguard, exploiting the fact that Mods admit that they are too busy to verify reports, and just delete them.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 85
- Country
Can you explain precisely what you found offensive about the article, because Dec27 refuses to discuss it any further.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,853
- Reaction score
- 6,273
- Country
Is there any point in discussing something on a thread that has been reported multiple times. A thread that was previously posted and deleted
Similar threads
