“Christ is king”

[King Billy]

Is there any point in discussing something on a thread that has been reported multiple times. A thread that was previously posted and deleted

What precisly is offensive about it?
Please quote passages that you think are anti-Semitic.

I don't know about anyone else, but I feel strongly, that if anyone reports a post, the forum (collectively) deserves to know why it was reported.
It's our forum, collectively speaking, it doesn't belong solely to those who will exploit the workload of the mods to have anything that they disagree with deleted.

I'm not suggesting that we moderate the comments. I'm saying it's our forum, we participate, and we deserve to know why someone has reported a post, whether it's been deleted or not.

If the reporting is anonymous, I see only the benefits of the 'reports' being publicly available.

 

[MNW67]

Is there any point in discussing something on a thread that has been reported multiple times. A thread that was previously posted and deleted

To my surprise, on this occasion, I actually found it interesting and informative. The potential fracturing of the far-ish right in the USA is a big issue.

Also, it links in to the reports of the US military being told to attack Iran in the name of Christ.

 

[Dec27]

Can you explain precisely what you found offensive about the article, because Dec27 refuses to discuss it any further.

The report process is anonymous and rightly so.

Can you stop trying to bully forum members.

 

[Dec27]

What precisly is offensive about it?
Please quote passages that you think are anti-Semitic.

I don't know about anyone else, but I feel strongly, that if anyone reports a post, the forum (collectively) deserves to know why it was reported.
It's our forum, collectively speaking, it doesn't belong solely to those who will exploit the workload of the mods to have anything that they disagree with deleted.

I'm not suggesting that we moderate the comments. I'm saying it's our forum, we participate, and we deserve to know why someone has reported a post, whether it's been deleted or not.

If the reporting is anonymous, I see only the benefits of the 'reports' being publicly available.

I’ve reported you for harassment.

You’re a little bully

 

[MNW67]

On this occasion, the article comes from one of the most respected news agencies in the world, the Associated Press. I don't see how we can ban such an article:

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

 

[King Billy]

The report process is anonymous and rightly so.

Can you stop trying to bully forum members.

Can you present a passage from that article posted by Odds, that you think is anti-Semitic.
You've previously claimed that there are anti-Semitic comments posted in this forum, and you've also claimed you couldn't represent them because they'd been deleted.

Here is your excellent opportuntiy to represent a passage from that article that you think is anti_semitic.

 

[King Billy]

I’ve reported you for harassment.

You’re a little bully

So you've reported an article presented by Odds, but you refuse to say why. You've previously claimed that anti-Semitic comments are posted in this forum, but you can't repost them because they've been deleted.
Now you have a perfect opportunity to present an example of an anti-Semitic comment. But you refuse the opportunity and instead report me for bullying.

I think the forum has recognised you for what you truly are.

 

[blup]

The problem is the muslim religion, everybody else gets along fine.

Lol

 

[King Billy]

Lol

Don't worry, I'm sure the morals of MBK and Dec27 have motivated them to report the islamophobic comment.

Or maybe not.

 

[motorbiking]

On this occasion, the article comes from one of the most respected news agencies in the world, the Associated Press. I don't see how we can ban such an article:

Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual somewhat. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.

It’s a pattern of behaviour.

Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.

 

[King Billy]

Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.

It’s a pattern of behaviour.

Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.

So there's nothing in that article that is anti-Semitic?

As an example of how hatred is fomented against Jews, (to fit your example of hatred against Hindus) can you present a passage from that article that is fomenting hatred against Jews?

When you've done that shall we take Spline's posts and compare those to your example of fomenting hatred against Hindus?
I suspect your moral attitude will have taken moral exception to his comments?
Perhaps you could tell us how many times you've reported his posts?

 

[MNW67]

Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual somewhat. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.

It’s a pattern of behaviour.

Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.

Posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a weird way of stirring hatred against Jews.

 

[King Billy]

Posting an article which criticises anti-Semitism is a weird way of stirring hatred against Jews.

Evidently they didn't read the article.
I hope they are scrutinising it now, desperately looking for something to justify having it deleted before and for reporting it again this time.

 

[motorbiking]

Posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a weird way of stirring hatred against Jews.

I disagree and in any case you are unable to see the big picture

 

[King Billy]

I disagree and in any case you are unable to see the big picture

So present an excerpt, or some excerpts from the article to justify your reporting it as anti-Semitic.
Dec27 couldn't, perhaps you'll have better luck.

Even if you are wrong and we disagree , it might prove that at least you've read it.