The two Bobs

motorbiking said:
LeftyFacts™
Click to expand...

Does that mean statements which are untrue, and according to you that is because of the political beliefs of the person making them, or statements which are true but which you are denying because of the political beliefs of the person making them?
 
motorbiking said:
I have replied and pointed out your error. I wasn't going to bother.
Click to expand...
Yeah, you got that wrong too, you confused two different data sets and made a tit of yourself. There's even a table that includes the percentage so I've no idea how you got it that wrong.

Can you smell toast? Is the left side of your face not responding properly?
 
motorbiking said:
Do you know what the appeal was about and why it was lost?

Lord Justice Edis said their decision "turned on a very narrow and technical legal issue and has nothing to do with whether the respondent committed the offence set out in the charge"..
Click to expand...
motorbiking said:
Daft Brush thinks they got off because there was no case to answer. The Judge disagrees:
Click to expand...

Be both of those how they may, the fact remains that they were not tried for any offence and have not been found guilty of any offence.

As a lawyer you should respect the legal process.
 
IT Minion said:
Yeah, you got that wrong too, you confused two different data sets and made a tit of yourself. There's even a table that includes the percentage so I've no idea how you got it that wrong.

Can you smell toast? Is the left side of your face not responding properly?
Click to expand...
I see you had a meltdown over being wrong.

Maybe you shouldn’t have brought it up.
 
blup said:
I don’t know, there are always implications but there is also the public interest.
Click to expand...

The public interest is best served by funding the justice system well enough for them not to have to employ people so incompetent and/or overworked that they make admin f-ups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top