What makes an asylum seeker an illegal migrant, and therefore not a refugee?
There are many reasons asylum seekers arrive without ID papers.
Individuals deemed a danger to UK national security or the public good are automatically refuseI wouldn't signal to the government that I was about to emigrate, by applying for a passport, or travel document.
In addition, take Pakistan, every adult has an ID card containing fingerprints and biometric data. Any asylum seeker from Pakistan can be verified by UK government matching that Biometric data with that held by Pakistan, to verify the ID of the asylum seeker.
Similarly for Afghan, Iranians, Eritreans, etc.
Of course if the government did check the asylum seekers ID with these countries, the government of the country of origin would know where the asylum seeker was, and could persecute the family.
So if I was intending to flee a country, I wouldn't alert the government by applying for a travel warrant, and I wouldn't risk the country of my destination informing my country of origin where I ended up, applying for asylum.
And to prevent the country of origin persecuting the family left behind.
If I was intending to send a family member out intot he wide world on their own ata relatively young age, I would want the strongest, the wisest and the least vulnerable to make that journey.
Would you have it otherwise? Would you send the most vulnerable?
So it's the religion of these asylum seekers that scares you so?
Ah, so you think they're coming to conquer, not for asylum?
How long has this invasion been going on, and how successful so far, are theses invaders from conquering the UK?