'Communist literature' in the Anne Widdecombe murder...

Lucy Connolly did incite something.
She didn't. She got close but didn't instruct anyone to do anything.

She pleaded guilty, under pressure from a dodgy government lawyer, so was never tried. She also deleted the comment, voluntarily, before any consequences. A jury would have been likely to let her go.

She deserved a telling-off. What she got was politically motivated, driven by the Prime Prosecutor Minister, now rightly booted out of office.
 
She didn't. She got close but didn't instruct anyone to do anything.

She pleaded guilty, under pressure from a dodgy government lawyer, so was never tried. She also deleted the comment, voluntarily, before any consequences. A jury would have been likely to let her go.

She deserved a telling-off. What she got was politically motivated, driven by the Prime Prosecutor Minister, now rightly booted out of office.

Also the tranny doubled down on her vile hatred even after being exposed.

Jail time.
 
She didn't. She got close but didn't instruct anyone to do anything.

set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the *******s


She pleaded guilty, under pressure from a dodgy government lawyer,

The problem there is that her lawyer did not work for the government, and was found to be anything but "dodgy"

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/d...ppeal-in-southport-tweet-case/5123344.article


so was never tried. She also deleted the comment, voluntarily, before any consequences.

By which time it had been viewed several hundred thousand times, and re-tweeted several hundred. Rioters later tried to set fire to buildings housing asylum seekers while they were occupied. Words have consequences.


A jury would have been likely to let her go.

We'll never know.


She deserved a telling-off.

I think she deserved more than that. There's no doubt that serious violence later erupted, which included trying to "set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the *******s". People who want to live in a civilised society shouldn't call for that.

Someone got a longer prison sentence for copying and posting her words.

What she got was politically motivated, driven by the Prime Prosecutor Minister, now rightly booted out of office.


What she got was what the court decided was appropriate.

If there was political pressure we're unlikely to find out soon.

But "Pour encourager les autres" is a well-known saying for a reason, and it would be naïve to think it could never happen here.

After all, when Judge Christopher Hehir sentenced people from Just Stop Oil to 4 & 5-year sentences, he said "there is a real risk of each of you committing further serious offences in pursuit of your objectives, unless you are deterred from doing so by exemplary sentences in this case ... Such sentences will also hopefully deter others."

Political pressure?

Was it political pressure which made him issue warrants for the arrest of people on the grounds that it was contempt of court for people on the pavement outside to hold up signs reminding everyone what it says on the walls of The Royal Courts of Justice?

Was it political pressure which led Lord Denning to deny the Birmingham Six the right to appeal in case they were telling the truth?
 
Last edited:
She deserved a telling-off. What she got was politically motivated, driven by the Prime Prosecutor Minister

Lucy Connolly didn't deserve a telling off, the immigrants shouldn't be here in the first place ; and the government that brought them here, and prosecuted her, is illegitimate.
 
What's the relevance of the perp being a 'white person'?

The relevance of that is that it's an attempt to avoid certain groups from assuming it was a non-white person and start rioting and attacking any non-white people or their housing they can find.

Which they do - they have form for it.
 
Suspect named: Joshua Kerry, quiet and shy.


It will be interesting to see what made him do it - if it is him. Ed Dutton says Hate Not Hope recently did a 'hit piece' on Ann Widdecombe, which they have now removed from their website.

 
She didn't. She got close but didn't instruct anyone to do anything.

She pleaded guilty, under pressure from a dodgy government lawyer, so was never tried. She also deleted the comment, voluntarily, before any consequences. A jury would have been likely to let her go.

She deserved a telling-off. What she got was politically motivated, driven by the Prime Prosecutor Minister, now rightly booted out of office.
she definitely got bad advice from her duty solicitor, but later on it would have been hard for her lawyer to help her. She probably should have risked a jury trial, with the benefit of hind sight.
 
That's quite a statement..
You'll have to point out a few of these Communist/socialist/Marxist publications.

If you don't have any understanding of marxism/leninism, or if you are too young to remember events of the 60s and 70s, you're completely lost in trying to understand modern European politics. Simply put, communism has changed its image to become more acceptable to more people...but it is the same evil that it always was.

 
If you don't have any understanding of marxism/leninism, or if you are too young to remember events of the 60s and 70s, you're completely lost in trying to understand modern European politics. Simply put, communism has changed its image to become more acceptable to more people...but it is the same evil that it always was.


Fake News
 
Back
Top