Forum full of far right wing snowflakes

[Highway Man]

The lie is that after it was pointed out to you why you were banned and you then acknowledged it (remembered ) this thread still starts off with
you maintaining that you were banned for saying
"When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?" -----when that is not the truth - that is your lie

He isn't what you would call the sharpest knife in the drawer.

 

[morqthana]

The proof of your trolling is that --- you were so keen to troll me that you haven’t realised that i was talking about warey4life complaining NOT YOU

Except I was responding to what you wrote about me,

wasn't I.

 

[morqthana]

Monotonous.. Reported

Maybe you could help end the "monotony" of me having to defend myself against false allegations of "trolling" by reporting those.

 

[Highway Man]

Maybe you could help end the "monotony" of me having to defend myself against false allegations of "trolling" by reporting those.

Maybe you could stop revving everyone up and stop responding? It is what I do. You could learn a lot by following my examples of being a top tier poster.

 

[warey4life]

The lie is that after it was pointed out to you why you were banned and you then acknowledged it (remembered ) this thread still starts off with
you maintaining that you were banned for saying
"When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?" -----when that is not the truth - that is your lie

There's no lying. I couldn't understand why I was banned when scrolling up through the thread, the only post from me was, "When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?", what's wrong with that I thought. I did later acknowledge my other post which is temporarily forgotten about, which has for some reason been taken down, when all it did was point out that Spline/Tubbs gets excited when he finds posts about immigrants committing rape.

 

[warey4life]

Maybe you could help end the "monotony" of me having to defend myself against false allegations of "trolling" by reporting those.

I think us normal people should start reporting every post we disagree with.

 

[Dec27]

Maybe you could help end the "monotony" of me having to defend myself against false allegations of "trolling" by reporting those.

But you are a relentless troll

 

[aveatry]

There's no lying. I couldn't understand why I was banned when scrolling up through the thread, the only post from me was, "When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?", what's wrong with that I thought. I did later acknowledge my other post which is temporarily forgotten about, which has for some reason been taken down, when all it did was point out that Spline/Tubbs gets excited when he finds posts about immigrants committing rape.

You have admitted why you were banned yet with this thread you still maintain that it was for saying -"When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?" amend the post or carry on with your lies then - leave it and everyone can see your lies.

 

[Dec27]

You have admitted why you were banned yet with this post you still maintain that it was for saying -"When's the last time you went to Bournemouth?" amend the post or carry on with your lies then - leave it and everyone can see your lies.

Blank him mate, he’s a worthless Twit

 

[morqthana]

Maybe you could stop revving everyone up

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.

and stop responding? It is what I do.

 

[morqthana]

But you are a relentless troll

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.

 

[Dec27]

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.

You never have a real opinion, you try and put posters on the back foot, so you can try and pontificate to them.

All you want to do is argue. Hence you are the forums biggest Troll by a county mile.

 

[Highway Man]

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.





View attachment 418667

That graph is only representative of the posts made, not the content. You can clearly see where you are going wrong.

 

[morqthana]

You never have a real opinion, you try and put posters on the back foot,

It is not possible to put someone "on the back foot" if they are standing solidly on firm ground.

If their position is somewhat shaky, that's their problem, not mine.

All you want to do is argue.

"Discuss or debate".

But you paint everything which is not nodding along in agreement as invalidly arguing.

I argue with things I disagree about, and there is a lot of that here (hence my thread about whether some political, social, etc views are welcome here or not).

As long as the language is civil, and insults and abuse avoided, everybody has the right to argue with things they disagree over. You not liking that does not mean that they are doing so cynically, just to provoke or anger people, and you should not falsely accuse them of that.

Hence you are the forums biggest Troll by a county mile.

Arguing is not trolling.

 

[aveatry]

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.





View attachment 418667

And there you show the problem.

You, like a number of other people here, assume that if I write something you don't like, the you not liking it is the only reason I wrote it. You assume my sole purpose was to wind you up. It never occurs to you that someone who disagrees with you, challenges you, argues with you, could genuinely hold the position they do.

You dont get it do you - its not about you disagreeing with with people - its they way you go on restlessly about it - just disagree say why and move on. Instead of searching going back years screen shooting highlighting quoting 15 posts from a person in massive long posts and keep it going for days. THATS THE TROLLING