I've set out before how it's relatively easy to keep tax down if you have enough money to bother.
Lineker's 35m doesn't mean he's in the super rich who'd gain massively by going abroad.
It takes 100 Linekers to make one Dyson
I had a look ( and paid £2.75 to Wikipedia on the way). We have 150 odd Billionaires, and 3 million ish millionaires.
Numbers are hard to pin down, but around a third of the Billi's move abroad or move assets abroad, and that number spikes when there's a tax tightening. Tightening non-dom status felt right, but apparently it cost us money.
I would suggest that of those of us with mere millions who would actually object to marginally higher taxes, many could relatively easily get more money or avoid a bit of tax here or there. I know I could. So far I haven't sought to avoid paying tax, but at around 50% marginal rate, yes it's a bit irksome. Where it's as simple as doing X instead of Y, to avoid a bit then yeah, I'm leaning that way.
It's the people already doing two jobs on near minimum wage that can't do much about their net income, and that's wrong.
Take some VAT off fuel, but for everyone? 1.2m a year. Pah! Why not load it onto reducing rates for smaller energy users?
If, say we made pensioners with net incomes of 20k pa or more pay National Insurance, that would bring in about 5Bn.
That's about 0.4% of the total (1.2T) personal tax levy, or 1.5% of social welfare and benefits ( including pensions).
Or it would allow us to increase our defence budget by 7%. Yeah I'd vote for that.