ICE told to get the eff out

MNW67 · 2026-01-16T12:29:07+0000

motorbiking said:
A reasonable person could see that the two women were attempting to obstruct and interfere.

Give some specifics.

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:30:05+0000

MNW67 said:
Give some specifics.

You’ll just reject them. Your mind is made up.

noseall · 2026-01-16T12:32:03+0000

MNW67 said:
Give some specifics.

They can't they won't.

The road was clear. Vehicles were moving freely up and down the road.

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:32:08+0000

Update. The officer suffered internal bleeding as a result of being hit by the vehicle according to DHS.

Now being a little sceptical, a bruise is technically internal bleeding.

Highway Man · 2026-01-16T12:32:29+0000

MNW67 said:
Give some specifics.

Pointless, you don't want to hear them. It is very clear what they was doing and we have all seen it on video so there is no other explanation other than what and why it happened needing no further explanation.

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:32:39+0000

noseall said:
They can't they won't.

The road was clear. Vehicles were moving freely up and down the road.

You’ve made your mind up.

MNW67 · 2026-01-16T12:32:49+0000

motorbiking said:
You’ll just reject them. Your mind is made up.

Grow up. You have been asked at least ten times now to explain how she was obstructing the agents, but you have always refused to answer. Whereas, I have been completely objective and reasonable throughout this discussion.

noseall · 2026-01-16T12:34:30+0000

motorbiking said:
You’ve made your mind up.

See if you can guess what those big objects are moving down the road in the vids. It rhymes with bars.

Highway Man · 2026-01-16T12:34:54+0000

The only point left is whether or not you agree with the outcome. I am satisfied the agent made the right move, just a pity that she didn't.

Highway Man · 2026-01-16T12:35:32+0000

noseall said:
See if you can guess what those big objects are moving down the road in the vids. It rhymes with bars.

cars?

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:35:41+0000

MNW67 said:
Grow up. You have been asked at least ten times now but you have always refused to answer. Whereas I have been completely objective and reasonable throughout this discussion.

you’ve shown no objectivity and repeatedly use bias language in this thread.

Come on, the debates are going much better this year, even Nosenout is trying hard not to troll.

You can do better

noseall · 2026-01-16T12:37:34+0000

Highway Man said:
The only point left is whether or not you agree with the outcome. I am satisfied the agent made the right move, just a pity that she didn't.

Fine. But no one has been able to explain (fully) what she actually did wrong. The obstruction nonsense falls down flat.

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:38:19+0000

Highway Man said:
The only point left is whether or not you agree with the outcome. I am satisfied the agent made the right move, just a pity that she didn't.

I’m less convinced. I have a suspicion that he may have deliberately put himself in this position to enable him to open fire.

But I don’t pretend that ICE had no lawful authority to tell them to get out and stop. They obviously intended to interfere and obstruct.

MNW67 · 2026-01-16T12:38:46+0000

motorbiking said:
you’ve shown no objectivity and repeatedly use bias language in this thread.

Come on, the debates are going much better this year, even Nosenout is trying hard not to troll.

You can do better

Typical flannel and evasion from you when you are ever asked for specifics.

A grown up asks: 'In what way was Renee obstructing the agents'

A child answers: 'I won't tell you. Because you will just reject them'

motorbiking · 2026-01-16T12:39:46+0000

MNW67 said:
Typical flannel and evasion from you when you are ever asked for specifics.

A grown up asks: 'In what way was Renee obstructing the agents'

A child answers: 'I won't tell you. Because you will just reject them'

Be a child then.

ICE told to get the eff out

Similar threads