Ask yourself if he had probable cause (you might want to google that first) to believe the objective was to cause an obstruction, giving him grounds to stop her.
We went through all this yesterday. You are just repeating yourself yet again. I had looked into all this days before you even joined the discussion.
So, to clarify yet again.
You are saying that there is no evidence so far of Renee causing any actual obstruction.
But you believe the arrest was lawful, because the agent had probable cause to believe that Renee wanted to cause an obstruction. Even though she wasn't actually causing one.
