ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
Ask yourself if he had probable cause (you might want to google that first) to believe the objective was to cause an obstruction, giving him grounds to stop her.

We went through all this yesterday. You are just repeating yourself yet again. I had looked into all this days before you even joined the discussion.

So, to clarify yet again.

You are saying that there is no evidence so far of Renee causing any actual obstruction.

But you believe the arrest was lawful, because the agent had probable cause to believe that Renee wanted to cause an obstruction. Even though she wasn't actually causing one.
 
We went through all this yesterday. You are just repeating yourself yet again. I had looked into all this days before you even joined the discussion.

So, to clarify yet again.

You are saying that there is no evidence so far of Renee causing any actual obstruction.

But you believe the arrest was lawful, because the agent had probable cause to believe that Renee wanted to cause an obstruction. Even though she wasn't actually causing one.
You’ve imagined this.
Most independent analysis has accepted she was causing an obstruction even for a moment and it was her intention to do so. There are also plenty of LEO opinion that says the shooting was justified.

I hold the view that I am suspicious he put himself into a position where could justify shooting.
 
For those who cannot see the big picture, Trump's USA is hurtling towards authoritarianism. All in plain sight.

There are quite a few people here who can see the big picture.

But the trouble is that they love what they see - they absolutely love it. They pretend to be defenders of democracy and then get all moist over somebody destroying it.
 
But you believe the arrest was lawful, because the agent had probable cause to believe that Renee wanted to cause an obstruction. Even though she wasn't actually causing one.
I cause an havoc most days in my cherry picker, I am parked as tight as I can get into the side of the road. If I parked in the middle of it I would imagine I would be obstructing the road
 
Exactly my point, this is all about Trump to you, never mind the fact that her dog would have been frightened to death. Shame on you.

I was commenting on the massive story going on in America about Trump trying to lock up his political opponents, simply for criticising his policies. That is a classic sign of an authoritarian. You brought Renee, Becca and the dog into it, not me.
 
I was commenting on the massive story going on in America about Trump trying to lock up his political opponents, simply for criticising his policies. That is a classic sign of an authoritarian. You brought Renee, Becca and the dog into it, not me.
If I had a problem with ICE (I don't) I would be protesting against them in a totally different way. I wouldn't be getting shot or put my dog and wife in that position either. I noticed you mentioned the ladies names but failed to mention the dogs name. Heartless
 
1768671228570.png
 
If I had a problem with ICE (I don't) I would be protesting against them in a totally different way. I wouldn't be getting shot or put my dog and wife in that position either. I noticed you mentioned the ladies names but failed to mention the dogs name. Heartless

If Keir Starmer tried to imprison Nigel Farage for criticising the policing of the asylum hotel protests, would you object. That is what Trump is doing. It is an absolutely massive story. There are many different strands to the ICE story. I realise it is difficult to keep a track of them all. That is why I have been separating them out and addressing them all objectively.
 
Back
Top