Of course they did, don't tell us you have found on AI that she shouldn't have been. Is there any aspect of the law that you actually agree with unless it is carrying a loaded gun or driving your car at armed officers?
Says the person posting page after page trying to defend the indefensible...
I think a tazer or similar high voltage stun would have sufficed. A shot in the leg in the wrong artery is still of course a risk he would bleed to death. When unarmed and a protester I don't think shooting is warranted.
Agreed but a shot in the shin would have been more than enough to stop him being so violent. Not sure the ICE agents have stun guns tbh?
You truly are not that bright...
Prove otherwiseYou truly are not that bright...
Of course if you can back up that claim, then feel free to do so...
Your expectant silence will ensue until you move on to the next topic that encapsulates your dislike of 'certain people'
As you can see from some of the other videos. Some of the observers, position themselves deliberately in the way and use their phone cameras is if they are filming some sort of feature. When they are told to move back they choose another spot in the way.
I want to see Ice officer go down for this but let's not deny there were a few people in that crowd antagonising Ice for a reaction. Shoving phones in their faces etc is risky.. I always find this strange, if I was going to organise this protest I would remind anyone operating outside of the organised strategy is risking death or injury.
So you can't back up your claim...
Ok I won't.So you can't back up your claim...
Strawman argument at it's worst!
And didn't you mention you weren't going to engage with me again in this topic?
Could you tell us where filming in public is a crime/felony?
