- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 27,232
- Reaction score
- 6,519
- Country

Towards the occupants, I believe.
There was another discussion about the difference between assault and battery a few months ago.
Assault in a technical sense means putting somebody in fear that they are going to experience violence. So, I think the argument is that, by spitting on the car, Alex made the agents fear that they were about to experience violence. Obviously, they knew they were protected by the glass. That is where it gets confusing. Is the argument that the agents might have feared that the spitting was a prelude to further violence.
But that violence was against the car. Are we arguing that it also put the agents in fear of violence. If they were so scared, why didn't they just drive off. It is all a bit tricky, legally.
Are you talking about here or there?That is what I have been arguing. It depends on context. A woman by herself probably would have felt threatened. But does the same apply to four heavily armed men in full combat gear.
where are you getting. this fear of violence from?