- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,491
- Reaction score
- 9,231
- Country

the bloke who got shot. That’s his wife. wife you can see where he gets it from.

the bloke who got shot. That’s his wife. wife you can see where he gets it from.
Towards a car?

Yes you mean like kicking their rear light in. That’s pretty violent.Towards the occupants, I believe.
There was another discussion about the difference between assault and battery a few months ago.
Assault in a technical sense means putting somebody in fear that they are going to experience violence. So, I think the argument is that, by spitting on the car. Alex made the agents fear that they were about to experience violence. Obviously, they knew they were protected by the glass. That is where it gets confusing. Is the argument that the agents might have feared that the spitting was a prelude to further violence.
Yes you mean like kicking their rear light in. That’s pretty violent.

If you are sat in your car and someone was spitting at you at the window then proceeded to kick your rear light in. Would you feel safe and think he is only taking out his frustrations on my car and my window it isn’t meBut that violence was against the car. Are we arguing that it also put the agents in fear of violence. If they were so scared, why didn't they just drive off. It is all a bit tricky, legally.
If you are sat in your car and someone was spitting at you at the window then proceeded to kick your rear light in. Would you feel safe and think he is only taking out his frustrations on my car and my window it isn’t me

Towards the occupants, I believe.
There was another discussion about the difference between assault and battery a few months ago.
Assault in a technical sense means putting somebody in fear that they are going to experience violence. So, I think the argument is that, by spitting on the car, Alex made the agents fear that they were about to experience violence. Obviously, they knew they were protected by the glass. That is where it gets confusing. Is the argument that the agents might have feared that the spitting was a prelude to further violence.
But that violence was against the car. Are we arguing that it also put the agents in fear of violence. If they were so scared, why didn't they just drive off. It is all a bit tricky, legally.
Are you talking about here or there?That is what I have been arguing. It depends on context. A woman by herself probably would have felt threatened. But does the same apply to four heavily armed men in full combat gear.
where are you getting. this fear of violence from?

Spitting is considered a physical act of force.Common assault requires that the victim fears (or apprehends) immediate, unlawful violence.
Spitting is considered a physical act for force.

This is battery. I thought you understood that?
In any case people have been convicted here and there when the Spit hits a helmet visor, riot shield or shoe

Were you there?It didn't hit anyone or any item they were wearing or holding.

