And another one..

My plan would be to only lock them up whilst their asylum applications are processed.

I would say all single men aged under 45.

Those who are granted asylum would obviously be released.

Those who fail asylum would be locked up until they are deported.

I believe this would suit most people in the country and would neutralise this issue.
We've been saying this for donkeys years.
The Leftists are not onboard with this idea.
They want mass immigration, unchecked, let to roam free in our country and do whatever they want.
 
We've been saying this for donkeys years.
The Leftists are not onboard with this idea.
They want mass immigration, unchecked, let to roam free in our country and do whatever they want.
Agree, why though can any lefty answer this?
 
My plan would be to only lock them up whilst their asylum applications are processed.

I would say all single men aged under 45.

Those who are granted asylum would obviously be released.

Those who fail asylum would be locked up until they are deported.

I believe this would suit most people in the country and would neutralise this issue.
I can’t believe you’re being serious now.

So a 46 year old man can’t commit a sex crime for instance!
 
I can’t believe you’re being serious now.

So a 46 year old man can’t commit a sex crime for instance!

It seemed a fair compromise to me. But we can set it higher.
 
It seemed a fair compromise to me. But we can set it higher.
Maybe we should lock up all priests up to a certain age...

Given the overall rate of offending of said occupation, that seems a fair compromise ;)
 
Sometimes you need to be pragmatic in order to stop something worse happening.

The public seem to have decided that small boats is the most important issue. If it can be neutralised, then we can move onto other issues.

We may find out that the public are revolted by the sight of asylum seekers behind barbed wire. In which case, a useful lesson will have been learnt.
"WIDE RIGHT!"
 
We've been saying this for donkeys years.
The Leftists are not onboard with this idea.
They want mass immigration, unchecked, let to roam free in our country and do whatever they want.
If you'd been paying attention you'd notice many people advocating better border control and a quicker selection of genuine asylum seekers.
The Tories cut those services, by the way.
 
If you'd been paying attention you'd notice many people advocating better border control and a quicker selection of genuine asylum seekers.
The Tories cut those services, by the way.
And they did wrong.
We need robust control of our borders to discouraged mass illegal immigration.
Kicking out criminals would be a good start.
Using all technology available to prevent them coming back would be nice.
And identify anyone entering the country.
Hard core prisons would be another good deterrent: south American style is appropriate.
 
It seemed a fair compromise to me. But we can set it higher.
It’s nothing like a compromise though is it.

I feel you might be Trolling a little, you seem too intelligent to actually believe an asylum prison for the under 45’s is a sensible solution.

Hey, ho though
 
It’s nothing like a compromise though is it.

I feel you might be Trolling a little, you seem too intelligent to actually believe an asylum prison for the under 45’s is a sensible solution.

Hey, ho though

I'm not trolling at all.

Last summer I spent a long time looking at which policies had been successful across Europe.

It would be a minimum security with decent facilities. More like a holiday camp you can't leave than a prison.

I think it's worth a try both to see if it acts as a deterrent and also to see whether the public really want it. Otherwise this issue is going to dominate the political headlines for years to come.
 
Mind you Greenland could do with an increase in population ??? And some new blood in the gene pool ??

Blimey with only 56000 people living there they must all be related to one another ????

Yes exactly ;)
 
Back
Top