- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 27,200
- Reaction score
- 6,499
- Country
No and no
“Christ is king”
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
To sum up, Odds posted some excerpts from an article.
You found it offensive and reported it.
But you can't or won't tell the forum what it was you found offensive, and you refuse to tell us if you explained to the mods why you found it offensive. At the same time you insist that you had read it.
I suspect it was because you thought it was anti-Semitic. You've previously claimed that you'd reported earlier posts because you thought they were anti-Semitic.
You were asked which posts these were that you found anti-Semitic, but you said you couldn't post them as proof of what you say, because they'd been deleted.
So I asked you to post anything from the article that Odds posted, that you thought was anti-Semitic as proof that some of us were posting anti-Semitic comments.
You posted an extract from somewhere, (which wasn't actually anti-Semitic). I asked you if it was a passage from the article presented by Odds, and could you indicate exactly where you copied it from, or post up the source of it, if it wasn't from Odd's article.
You didn't have the courtesy to respond to either of my requests.
So now you had the perfect opportunity to prove that some anti-Semitic posts were posted by some posters, you've declined that opportunity, and splurted your usual rubbish about deleted posts.
Odd's post remains, and you think it's anti-Semitic, so please post an extract from that article to prove that anti-Semitic comments are posted.
I think that you're an exploitative blaguard, exploiting the fact that Mods admit that they are too busy to verify reports, and just delete them.
You found it offensive and reported it.
But you can't or won't tell the forum what it was you found offensive, and you refuse to tell us if you explained to the mods why you found it offensive. At the same time you insist that you had read it.
I suspect it was because you thought it was anti-Semitic. You've previously claimed that you'd reported earlier posts because you thought they were anti-Semitic.
You were asked which posts these were that you found anti-Semitic, but you said you couldn't post them as proof of what you say, because they'd been deleted.
So I asked you to post anything from the article that Odds posted, that you thought was anti-Semitic as proof that some of us were posting anti-Semitic comments.
You posted an extract from somewhere, (which wasn't actually anti-Semitic). I asked you if it was a passage from the article presented by Odds, and could you indicate exactly where you copied it from, or post up the source of it, if it wasn't from Odd's article.
You didn't have the courtesy to respond to either of my requests.
So now you had the perfect opportunity to prove that some anti-Semitic posts were posted by some posters, you've declined that opportunity, and splurted your usual rubbish about deleted posts.
Odd's post remains, and you think it's anti-Semitic, so please post an extract from that article to prove that anti-Semitic comments are posted.
I think that you're an exploitative blaguard, exploiting the fact that Mods admit that they are too busy to verify reports, and just delete them.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
Can you explain precisely what you found offensive about the article, because Dec27 refuses to discuss it any further.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 27,200
- Reaction score
- 6,499
- Country
Is there any point in discussing something on a thread that has been reported multiple times. A thread that was previously posted and deleted
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
What precisly is offensive about it?
Please quote passages that you think are anti-Semitic.
I don't know about anyone else, but I feel strongly, that if anyone reports a post, the forum (collectively) deserves to know why it was reported.
It's our forum, collectively speaking, it doesn't belong solely to those who will exploit the workload of the mods to have anything that they disagree with deleted.
I'm not suggesting that we moderate the comments. I'm saying it's our forum, we participate, and we deserve to know why someone has reported a post, whether it's been deleted or not.
If the reporting is anonymous, I see only the benefits of the 'reports' being publicly available.
To my surprise, on this occasion, I actually found it interesting and informative. The potential fracturing of the far-ish right in the USA is a big issue.
Also, it links in to the reports of the US military being told to attack Iran in the name of Christ.
The report process is anonymous and rightly so.
Can you stop trying to bully forum members.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
Can you present a passage from that article posted by Odds, that you think is anti-Semitic.
You've previously claimed that there are anti-Semitic comments posted in this forum, and you've also claimed you couldn't represent them because they'd been deleted.
Here is your excellent opportuntiy to represent a passage from that article that you think is anti_semitic.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
So you've reported an article presented by Odds, but you refuse to say why. You've previously claimed that anti-Semitic comments are posted in this forum, but you can't repost them because they've been deleted.
Now you have a perfect opportunity to present an example of an anti-Semitic comment. But you refuse the opportunity and instead report me for bullying.
I think the forum has recognised you for what you truly are.
Lol
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,910
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
Don't worry, I'm sure the morals of MBK and Dec27 have motivated them to report the islamophobic comment.
Or maybe not.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 27,200
- Reaction score
- 6,499
- Country
Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual somewhat. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.
It’s a pattern of behaviour.
Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.
Similar threads
