“Christ is king”

I haven't read the article and have no intention of doing so,

So you are therefore completely unaware that the article is warning of, critical of, and citing examples of, the rise of antisemitism amongst elements of the Christian right in the USA. That the phrase "Christ is King" is being used by some as coded antisemitism in exactly the same way that you are so keen to assert that criticism of Israel or Zionism is being used.

You've not read it, so none of these were about the subject of Odd's post




They were all about who posted it. Pure "ad hominem" motivation.


I will reiterate the fact that every time Odds posts a thread like this he does so with one sole intention.

What do you think could be the intention of somebody posting an article which warns of, is critical of, and cites examples of, the rise of antisemitism amongst elements of the Christian right in the USA?
 
So you are therefore completely unaware that the article is warning of, critical of, and citing examples of, the rise of antisemitism amongst elements of the Christian right in the USA. That the phrase "Christ is King" is being used by some as coded antisemitism in exactly the same way that you are so keen to assert that criticism of Israel or Zionism is being used.

You've not read it, so none of these were about the subject of Odd's post




They were all about who posted it. Pure "ad hominem" motivation.




What do you think could be the intention of somebody posting an article which warns of, is critical of, and cites examples of, the rise of antisemitism amongst elements of the Christian right in the USA?
You’re right. We are all wrong.

Well done King Billy
 
Christ is indeed King and as such the term should only be used to reflect that and to give praise to Jesus.

That is also what Catholic scholars are saying, according to the article in the OP.
 
23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself. Says a lot to me but then I am number 1 on here and am probably more aware of these things than the average poster. One of the great things about me is how sensitive I am and self aware.. Think on....
 
23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself. Says a lot to me but then I am number 1 on here and am probably more aware of these things than the average poster. One of the great things about me is how sensitive I am and self aware.. Think on....

23 pages and most people commenting admit they haven't even read the article.

It's a shame because it is really interesting and covers some extremely important issues.
 
23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself. Says a lot to me but then I am number 1 on here and am probably more aware of these things than the average poster. One of the great things about me is how sensitive I am and self aware.. Think on....
You're number 8 but whatever
 
23 pages and most people commenting admit they haven't even read the article.

It's a shame because it is really interesting and covers some extremely important issues.
Has anyone actually admitted to not reading it “most”

I’ve read it
 
Has anyone actually admitted to not reading it “most”

I’ve read it

Good point.

I suppose only HWM and Fillyboy have actually admitted that they haven't read it.

MBK claims to have read it but seems to have no clue what is in it.
 
Back
Top