“Christ is king”

Koolpc · 8 Mar 2026

Highway Man said:
23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself. Says a lot to me but then I am number 1 on here and am probably more aware of these things than the average poster. One of the great things about me is how sensitive I am and self aware.. Think on....

Reported

Koolpc · 8 Mar 2026

I read it 123 times....

Dec27 · 8 Mar 2026

morqthana said:
So where is the antisemitism in it?

Wow! That makes no sense.

Please give up, or try harder

Dec27 · 8 Mar 2026

Koolpc said:
I read it 123 times....

Woof

Odds · 8 Mar 2026

Koolpc said:
Christ is indeed King and as such the term should only be used to reflect that and to give praise to Jesus.

No.

The term was used by the Romans to mock him.

Koolpc · 8 Mar 2026

Dec27 said:
Woof

Reported

Koolpc · 8 Mar 2026

Odds said:
No.

The term was used by the Romans to mock him.

Yes, He is King. If you understood Christianity you would see that.

Koolpc · 8 Mar 2026

Odds said:
No.

The term was used by the Romans to mock him.

What does it mean for Christ to be King?

Christ’s role as King is a central theme throughout both the Old and New Testaments. This kingship is not merely symbolic; it encompasses the prophetic fulfillment of an eternal kingship promised through the line of David, the authority demonstrated in His earthly ministry, and the ultimate reign Christ holds in the hearts of believers and over all creation. When Scripture describes Christ as King, it affirms His divine right to rule, His authority over all realms-physical, spiritual, and eternal-and His unique position as the long-awaited Messiah.

Source

aveatry · 8 Mar 2026

So as I said in post #300

Its all you need to know to prove that king willy is a foreign agitator -- that's without the lack of providing a simple photo to prove otherwise. You can see just by the times that he posts that he is not in the UK-- watch as he reply’s to my post at around 2.30am UK time after being silent from 2.30 mid day here.

morqthana · 8 Mar 2026

Dec27 said:
Wow! That makes no sense.

Please give up, or try harder

You said you've read this article:

Dec27 said:
I’ve read it

So where is the antisemitism in it.

Odds · 9 Mar 2026

Koolpc said:
What does it mean for Christ to be King?

Christ’s role as King is a central theme throughout both the Old and New Testaments. This kingship is not merely symbolic; it encompasses the prophetic fulfillment of an eternal kingship promised through the line of David, the authority demonstrated in His earthly ministry, and the ultimate reign Christ holds in the hearts of believers and over all creation. When Scripture describes Christ as King, it affirms His divine right to rule, His authority over all realms-physical, spiritual, and eternal-and His unique position as the long-awaited Messiah.

Source

Yes, that was a title imposed upon him and the reason why he was crucified.
Not actually true, though.
The Sanhedrin set him up.

Jesus never claimed he was king.

King Billy · 9 Mar 2026

aveatry said:
And you then claimed that you could not provide the proof and a photo because you dont have a smart phone and are housebound with only one hand - that has to be the forums most ridiculous swerve and excuse

Yes that is what you said, which was a blatant lie, because what I actually said, and you've correctly quoted me, was:

King Billy said:
Except the ones who are house-bound, or the ones who have only one hand, or the ones that don't use a smartphone, or the ones that have no need to kowtow to an eejit in the internet.
But I need no excuse.

If you can't see the difference between me identifying some people who could not comply with your demand, and you thinking I was claiming to be one of those, then I overestimated you.
I even made it clear that I did not need such an excuse.
So you are either really incapable of reading and undrstanding plain English, or you are an inveterate liar.
As it's not the only time you've lied, I know which I believe.

So jog on, lying eejit.

King Billy · 9 Mar 2026

morqthana said:
I'm not his "other user name".

STOP LYING.

Dec27 really can't help himself. He's on the wrong end of the stick again, and the only way to redeem himself, in his view, is to lie his way out of it, and try to reduce the thread to ad hominem attacks, hoping it will, be deleted.
He's probably trying to garner support from others to also report the thread.

King Billy · 9 Mar 2026

MNW67 said:
I have actually been trying to flip it and think of it from the other side, to see if I can get my head around why this particular article caused such a strong reaction amongst so many posters. It has actually been very difficult for me, being such an objective and rational person who enjoys an open debate. But this is what I have come up with:

Consider for a moment that there is a particular poster on here who has, rightly or wrongly, developed a reputation amongst some for being both right wing and hating Muslims. And say that person posted an article which discussed the rise of Muslim hatred, say in Germany, amongst the far left. From a personal standpoint, as a rational and objective person, I would be interested in reading that article and understanding those developments. But what might make some other posters report it. I am trying to get into the mindset of the sort of person who would find that sort of thing so offensive that it needed reporting.

Odds frequently posts articles that require a fair degree of intelligence to fully comprehend.
As MBK, koolpc, dec27, et al have demonstrated that they don't possess sufficient intelligent capability, it's hardly surprising that they confuse an academic article with a prejudicial one.
And as Odds is the one who posts most such academic studies they assume, mistakenly, that Odds is anti-Semitic.
Then whenever Odds posts an article, they automatically assume it must be anti-Semitic because Odds has posted it.
For them it's a kind of self-fulfilling process:
Odds posts an article which they can't comprehend --> It must be anti-Semitic --> Odds posts another article that they can't understand --> in their eyes Odds is anti-Semitic --> every post he makes presenting an article is assumed to be anti-Semitic. --> they're convinced that Odds ia anti-Semitic.

King Billy · 9 Mar 2026

Dec27 said:
So based on the above, and knowing what you know. Would you be suspicious?

I’ve looked into it and the term is gaining use in an antisemitic way.

So when Christians are singing about Christ the King, they're being anti-Semitic?

“Christ is king”

Similar threads